500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS/IS 178 HOLLISWOOD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

42

15%

LEVEL 2

90

31%

LEVEL 3

81

28%

LEVEL 4

74

26%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

45

16%

LEVEL 2

85

29%

LEVEL 3

86

30%

LEVEL 4

73

25%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

24

17%

LEVEL 2

38

28%

LEVEL 3

41

30%

LEVEL 4

35

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

18

13%

LEVEL 2

43

30%

LEVEL 3

50

35%

LEVEL 4

32

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

79
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

18

12%

LEVEL 2

52

35%

LEVEL 3

40

27%

LEVEL 4

39

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

27

18%

LEVEL 2

42

29%

LEVEL 3

36

25%

LEVEL 4

41

28%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

25
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

11

28%

LEVEL 3

14

36%

LEVEL 4

11

28%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

25
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

10

26%

LEVEL 4

15

39%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

106
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

26

14%

LEVEL 2

57

30%

LEVEL 3

53

28%

LEVEL 4

53

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

111
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

29

15%

LEVEL 2

59

30%

LEVEL 3

62

31%

LEVEL 4

49

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

6

25%

LEVEL 2

9

38%

LEVEL 3

6

25%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

7

39%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

3

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

6

20%

LEVEL 2

12

40%

LEVEL 3

6

20%

LEVEL 4

6

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

4

15%

LEVEL 2

8

31%

LEVEL 3

8

31%

LEVEL 4

6

23%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

21

9%

LEVEL 2

67

28%

LEVEL 3

75

32%

LEVEL 4

74

31%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

21

9%

LEVEL 2

74

30%

LEVEL 3

78

32%

LEVEL 4

71

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

21

42%

LEVEL 2

23

46%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

24

53%

LEVEL 2

11

24%

LEVEL 3

8

18%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

151
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

38

14%

LEVEL 2

83

31%

LEVEL 3

79

29%

LEVEL 4

72

26%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

147
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

39

14%

LEVEL 2

83

31%

LEVEL 3

81

30%

LEVEL 4

66

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

6

30%

LEVEL 2

2

10%

LEVEL 3

5

25%

LEVEL 4

7

35%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

115
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

18

10%

LEVEL 2

47

26%

LEVEL 3

52

29%

LEVEL 4

63

35%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

112
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

18

10%

LEVEL 2

55

30%

LEVEL 3

55

30%

LEVEL 4

57

31%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

24

22%

LEVEL 2

43

40%

LEVEL 3

29

27%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

27

26%

LEVEL 2

30

29%

LEVEL 3

31

30%

LEVEL 4

16

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

151
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

39

14%

LEVEL 2

87

31%

LEVEL 3

78

28%

LEVEL 4

73

26%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

157
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

44

15%

LEVEL 2

83

29%

LEVEL 3

85

30%

LEVEL 4

72

25%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.