500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS/IS 178 HOLLISWOOD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

47

14%

LEVEL 2

92

27%

LEVEL 3

124

36%

LEVEL 4

80

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

202
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

50

15%

LEVEL 2

85

25%

LEVEL 3

129

38%

LEVEL 4

73

22%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

114
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

15

9%

LEVEL 2

35

21%

LEVEL 3

69

42%

LEVEL 4

45

27%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

111
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

16

10%

LEVEL 2

36

22%

LEVEL 3

73

45%

LEVEL 4

38

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

90
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

32

18%

LEVEL 2

57

32%

LEVEL 3

55

31%

LEVEL 4

35

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

91
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

34

20%

LEVEL 2

49

28%

LEVEL 3

56

32%

LEVEL 4

35

20%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

33
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

10

22%

LEVEL 3

15

33%

LEVEL 4

18

39%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

36
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

9

19%

LEVEL 3

19

40%

LEVEL 4

17

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

129
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

37

16%

LEVEL 2

63

28%

LEVEL 3

85

37%

LEVEL 4

44

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

126
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

36

16%

LEVEL 2

66

29%

LEVEL 3

86

38%

LEVEL 4

40

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

4

15%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

10

37%

LEVEL 4

5

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

6

29%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

6

29%

LEVEL 4

6

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

10

29%

LEVEL 4

12

34%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

5

16%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

13

41%

LEVEL 4

9

28%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

199
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

22

8%

LEVEL 2

68

24%

LEVEL 3

120

42%

LEVEL 4

79

27%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

23

8%

LEVEL 2

71

25%

LEVEL 3

123

43%

LEVEL 4

70

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

25

46%

LEVEL 2

24

44%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

27

54%

LEVEL 2

14

28%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

200
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

42

13%

LEVEL 2

87

26%

LEVEL 3

120

36%

LEVEL 4

80

24%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

196
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

45

14%

LEVEL 2

81

25%

LEVEL 3

123

38%

LEVEL 4

73

23%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

6

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

138
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

27

13%

LEVEL 2

51

24%

LEVEL 3

80

37%

LEVEL 4

58

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

138
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

24

11%

LEVEL 2

51

24%

LEVEL 3

82

38%

LEVEL 4

56

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

20

16%

LEVEL 2

41

32%

LEVEL 3

44

35%

LEVEL 4

22

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

26

21%

LEVEL 2

34

27%

LEVEL 3

47

38%

LEVEL 4

17

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

196
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

45

14%

LEVEL 2

90

27%

LEVEL 3

120

36%

LEVEL 4

76

23%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

196
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

48

15%

LEVEL 2

83

25%

LEVEL 3

124

38%

LEVEL 4

72

22%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

4

33%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

5

50%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.