500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 173 FRESH MEADOWS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to the State鈥檚 new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

352
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

38

8%

LEVEL 2

91

19%

LEVEL 3

137

28%

LEVEL 4

215

45%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

347
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

39

9%

LEVEL 2

72

16%

LEVEL 3

104

23%

LEVEL 4

243

53%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

160
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

51

23%

LEVEL 3

56

25%

LEVEL 4

104

46%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

159
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

17

8%

LEVEL 2

38

18%

LEVEL 3

52

24%

LEVEL 4

107

50%

MALE

PROFICIENT

192
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

25

10%

LEVEL 2

40

16%

LEVEL 3

81

32%

LEVEL 4

111

43%

MALE

PROFICIENT

188
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

22

9%

LEVEL 2

34

14%

LEVEL 3

52

21%

LEVEL 4

136

56%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

5

56%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

6

60%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

241
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

32

11%

LEVEL 3

72

26%

LEVEL 4

169

60%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

238
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

23

9%

LEVEL 3

49

18%

LEVEL 4

189

70%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

80
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

17

13%

LEVEL 2

32

25%

LEVEL 3

48

37%

LEVEL 4

32

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

68
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

13

12%

LEVEL 2

32

28%

LEVEL 3

34

30%

LEVEL 4

34

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

12

22%

LEVEL 2

20

37%

LEVEL 3

14

26%

LEVEL 4

8

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

13

23%

LEVEL 2

17

30%

LEVEL 3

14

25%

LEVEL 4

12

21%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

329
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

13

3%

LEVEL 2

72

17%

LEVEL 3

126

30%

LEVEL 4

203

49%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

324
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

13

3%

LEVEL 2

52

13%

LEVEL 3

92

24%

LEVEL 4

232

60%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

23
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

25

37%

LEVEL 2

19

28%

LEVEL 3

11

16%

LEVEL 4

12

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

23
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

26

38%

LEVEL 2

20

29%

LEVEL 3

12

17%

LEVEL 4

11

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

330
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

34

8%

LEVEL 2

77

17%

LEVEL 3

128

29%

LEVEL 4

202

46%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

325
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

31

7%

LEVEL 2

62

15%

LEVEL 3

97

23%

LEVEL 4

228

55%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

22
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

4

10%

LEVEL 2

14

35%

LEVEL 3

9

23%

LEVEL 4

13

33%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

22
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

8

20%

LEVEL 2

10

25%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

15

38%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

154
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

24

13%

LEVEL 3

53

29%

LEVEL 4

101

55%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

148
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

25

14%

LEVEL 3

38

21%

LEVEL 4

110

60%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

198
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

31

10%

LEVEL 2

67

23%

LEVEL 3

84

28%

LEVEL 4

114

39%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

199
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

28

10%

LEVEL 2

47

17%

LEVEL 3

66

24%

LEVEL 4

133

49%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.