500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 173 FRESH MEADOWS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

348
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

27

6%

LEVEL 2

93

20%

LEVEL 3

128

27%

LEVEL 4

220

47%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

331
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 482

LEVEL 1

50

10%

LEVEL 2

101

21%

LEVEL 3

135

28%

LEVEL 4

196

41%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

181
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

46

19%

LEVEL 3

70

29%

LEVEL 4

111

46%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

168
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

23

10%

LEVEL 2

48

20%

LEVEL 3

72

30%

LEVEL 4

96

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

167
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

47

21%

LEVEL 3

58

25%

LEVEL 4

109

48%

MALE

PROFICIENT

163
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

27

11%

LEVEL 2

53

22%

LEVEL 3

63

26%

LEVEL 4

100

41%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

234
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

35

13%

LEVEL 3

69

25%

LEVEL 4

165

59%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

226
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

37

13%

LEVEL 3

78

28%

LEVEL 4

148

54%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

87
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

11

8%

LEVEL 2

38

28%

LEVEL 3

39

29%

LEVEL 4

48

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

75
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

17

12%

LEVEL 2

45

33%

LEVEL 3

42

31%

LEVEL 4

33

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

7

16%

LEVEL 2

17

38%

LEVEL 3

17

38%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

20

33%

LEVEL 2

16

27%

LEVEL 3

13

22%

LEVEL 4

11

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

323
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

71

18%

LEVEL 3

112

28%

LEVEL 4

211

53%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

314
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

21

5%

LEVEL 2

68

17%

LEVEL 3

125

31%

LEVEL 4

189

47%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

25
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

24

34%

LEVEL 2

22

31%

LEVEL 3

16

23%

LEVEL 4

9

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

29

37%

LEVEL 2

33

42%

LEVEL 3

10

13%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

329
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

23

5%

LEVEL 2

77

18%

LEVEL 3

117

27%

LEVEL 4

212

49%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

313
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

38

9%

LEVEL 2

91

21%

LEVEL 3

128

29%

LEVEL 4

185

42%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

19
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

4

10%

LEVEL 2

16

41%

LEVEL 3

11

28%

LEVEL 4

8

21%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

18
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

12

30%

LEVEL 2

10

25%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

11

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

151
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

30

16%

LEVEL 3

44

24%

LEVEL 4

107

58%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

138
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

32

18%

LEVEL 3

52

29%

LEVEL 4

86

48%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

197
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

22

8%

LEVEL 2

63

22%

LEVEL 3

84

30%

LEVEL 4

113

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

193
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

42

14%

LEVEL 2

69

23%

LEVEL 3

83

27%

LEVEL 4

110

36%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.