500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 162 JOHN GOLDEN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

269
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

18

5%

LEVEL 2

64

18%

LEVEL 3

109

31%

LEVEL 4

160

46%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

291
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

64

17%

LEVEL 3

116

32%

LEVEL 4

175

48%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

111
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

33

22%

LEVEL 3

49

32%

LEVEL 4

62

41%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

118
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

35

22%

LEVEL 3

44

28%

LEVEL 4

74

47%

MALE

PROFICIENT

158
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

31

16%

LEVEL 3

60

30%

LEVEL 4

98

49%

MALE

PROFICIENT

173
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

29

14%

LEVEL 3

72

34%

LEVEL 4

101

48%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

216
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

29

11%

LEVEL 3

76

30%

LEVEL 4

140

55%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

240
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

21

8%

LEVEL 3

78

29%

LEVEL 4

162

61%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

37
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

17

30%

LEVEL 3

22

39%

LEVEL 4

15

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

38
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

21

34%

LEVEL 3

28

45%

LEVEL 4

10

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

6

19%

LEVEL 2

14

45%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

5

19%

LEVEL 2

12

46%

LEVEL 3

7

27%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

252
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

47

15%

LEVEL 3

101

33%

LEVEL 4

151

49%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

267
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

47

15%

LEVEL 3

102

32%

LEVEL 4

165

52%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

10

23%

LEVEL 2

17

39%

LEVEL 3

8

18%

LEVEL 4

9

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

7

15%

LEVEL 2

17

35%

LEVEL 3

14

29%

LEVEL 4

10

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

250
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

60

19%

LEVEL 3

100

31%

LEVEL 4

150

46%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

273
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

57

17%

LEVEL 3

112

33%

LEVEL 4

161

47%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

19
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

5

18%

LEVEL 2

4

14%

LEVEL 3

9

32%

LEVEL 4

10

36%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

18
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

28%

LEVEL 3

4

16%

LEVEL 4

14

56%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

117
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

25

17%

LEVEL 3

36

25%

LEVEL 4

81

57%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

120
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

19

14%

LEVEL 3

43

31%

LEVEL 4

77

55%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

152
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

17

8%

LEVEL 2

39

19%

LEVEL 3

73

35%

LEVEL 4

79

38%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

171
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

45

20%

LEVEL 3

73

32%

LEVEL 4

98

43%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.