500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 221 NORTH HILLS SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

231
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

16

5%

LEVEL 2

45

15%

LEVEL 3

90

31%

LEVEL 4

141

48%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

226
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

22

7%

LEVEL 2

50

17%

LEVEL 3

76

26%

LEVEL 4

150

50%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

116
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

22

15%

LEVEL 3

47

32%

LEVEL 4

69

47%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

23

16%

LEVEL 3

40

28%

LEVEL 4

75

52%

MALE

PROFICIENT

115
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

23

16%

LEVEL 3

43

30%

LEVEL 4

72

50%

MALE

PROFICIENT

111
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

16

10%

LEVEL 2

27

18%

LEVEL 3

36

23%

LEVEL 4

75

49%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

174
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

18

9%

LEVEL 3

60

30%

LEVEL 4

114

58%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

170
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

18

9%

LEVEL 3

46

24%

LEVEL 4

124

65%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

27
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

6

13%

LEVEL 2

12

27%

LEVEL 3

13

29%

LEVEL 4

14

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

28
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

9

18%

LEVEL 2

14

27%

LEVEL 3

18

35%

LEVEL 4

10

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

4

10%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

14

33%

LEVEL 4

10

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

10

21%

LEVEL 2

16

33%

LEVEL 3

9

19%

LEVEL 4

13

27%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

215
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

32

13%

LEVEL 3

80

31%

LEVEL 4

135

53%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

216
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

38

15%

LEVEL 3

71

27%

LEVEL 4

145

56%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

9

24%

LEVEL 2

13

34%

LEVEL 3

10

26%

LEVEL 4

6

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

15

41%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

5

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

218
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

40

15%

LEVEL 3

82

30%

LEVEL 4

136

50%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

220
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

20

7%

LEVEL 2

45

16%

LEVEL 3

70

25%

LEVEL 4

150

53%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

13
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

8

38%

LEVEL 4

5

24%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

6

46%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

124
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

23

15%

LEVEL 3

40

27%

LEVEL 4

84

56%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

146
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

21

12%

LEVEL 3

51

29%

LEVEL 4

95

54%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

107
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

22

15%

LEVEL 3

50

35%

LEVEL 4

57

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

14

11%

LEVEL 2

29

24%

LEVEL 3

25

20%

LEVEL 4

55

45%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.