500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 205 ALEXANDER GRAHAM BELL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

10

7%

LEVEL 3

39

28%

LEVEL 4

84

61%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

18

13%

LEVEL 3

23

17%

LEVEL 4

92

66%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

56
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

17

27%

LEVEL 4

39

62%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

12

18%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

48

71%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

4

5%

LEVEL 3

22

29%

LEVEL 4

45

60%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

5

7%

LEVEL 2

6

8%

LEVEL 3

16

23%

LEVEL 4

44

62%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

54
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

5%

LEVEL 3

14

25%

LEVEL 4

40

70%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

55
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

7%

LEVEL 3

10

17%

LEVEL 4

45

76%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

43
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

3

6%

LEVEL 3

13

27%

LEVEL 4

30

63%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

37
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

6

13%

LEVEL 3

5

11%

LEVEL 4

32

71%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

3

13%

LEVEL 3

8

33%

LEVEL 4

12

50%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

3

11%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

13

46%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

3%

LEVEL 3

30

27%

LEVEL 4

79

71%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

106
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

9

8%

LEVEL 3

17

15%

LEVEL 4

89

77%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

5

19%

LEVEL 2

7

27%

LEVEL 3

9

35%

LEVEL 4

5

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

5

22%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

120
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

8

6%

LEVEL 3

38

29%

LEVEL 4

82

62%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

110
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

16

12%

LEVEL 3

20

15%

LEVEL 4

90

69%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

3

4%

LEVEL 3

15

19%

LEVEL 4

59

76%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

12

15%

LEVEL 3

10

12%

LEVEL 4

57

70%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

7

12%

LEVEL 3

24

40%

LEVEL 4

25

42%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

13

22%

LEVEL 4

35

60%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.