500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 203 OAKLAND GARDENS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

357
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

6

1%

LEVEL 2

40

10%

LEVEL 3

100

25%

LEVEL 4

257

64%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

363
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

16

4%

LEVEL 2

41

10%

LEVEL 3

87

21%

LEVEL 4

276

66%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

177
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

20

10%

LEVEL 3

45

23%

LEVEL 4

132

66%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

178
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

19

9%

LEVEL 3

43

21%

LEVEL 4

135

67%

MALE

PROFICIENT

180
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

20

10%

LEVEL 3

55

27%

LEVEL 4

125

62%

MALE

PROFICIENT

185
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

22

10%

LEVEL 3

44

20%

LEVEL 4

141

65%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

5

45%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

271
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

13

5%

LEVEL 3

65

23%

LEVEL 4

206

72%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

278
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

18

6%

LEVEL 3

52

17%

LEVEL 4

226

75%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

46
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

16

25%

LEVEL 3

21

33%

LEVEL 4

25

39%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

53
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

4

6%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

20

32%

LEVEL 4

33

52%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

5

50%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

10

27%

LEVEL 4

17

46%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

13

38%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

11

32%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

325
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

22

6%

LEVEL 3

77

22%

LEVEL 4

248

71%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

334
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

23

6%

LEVEL 3

67

18%

LEVEL 4

267

73%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

32
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

18

34%

LEVEL 3

23

43%

LEVEL 4

9

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

29
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

9

16%

LEVEL 2

18

32%

LEVEL 3

20

36%

LEVEL 4

9

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

346
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

38

10%

LEVEL 3

96

25%

LEVEL 4

250

64%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

345
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

9

2%

LEVEL 2

37

9%

LEVEL 3

79

20%

LEVEL 4

266

68%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

7

47%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

18
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

7

24%

LEVEL 2

4

14%

LEVEL 3

8

28%

LEVEL 4

10

34%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

218
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

17

7%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

164

69%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

225
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

17

7%

LEVEL 3

49

20%

LEVEL 4

176

71%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

139
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

23

14%

LEVEL 3

46

28%

LEVEL 4

93

56%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

138
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

24

14%

LEVEL 3

38

22%

LEVEL 4

100

58%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.