500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS/MS 114 BELLE HARBOR GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

219
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

50

13%

LEVEL 2

103

28%

LEVEL 3

133

36%

LEVEL 4

86

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

211
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

44

13%

LEVEL 2

94

27%

LEVEL 3

105

30%

LEVEL 4

106

30%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

117
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

19

11%

LEVEL 2

44

24%

LEVEL 3

69

38%

LEVEL 4

48

27%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

15

9%

LEVEL 2

42

24%

LEVEL 3

59

34%

LEVEL 4

56

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

102
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

31

16%

LEVEL 2

59

31%

LEVEL 3

64

33%

LEVEL 4

38

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

96
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

29

16%

LEVEL 2

52

29%

LEVEL 3

46

26%

LEVEL 4

50

28%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

203
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

37

11%

LEVEL 2

91

27%

LEVEL 3

122

37%

LEVEL 4

81

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

193
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

35

11%

LEVEL 2

80

26%

LEVEL 3

92

30%

LEVEL 4

101

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

8

29%

LEVEL 2

8

29%

LEVEL 3

8

29%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

3

12%

LEVEL 2

10

38%

LEVEL 3

10

38%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

74

26%

LEVEL 3

113

40%

LEVEL 4

80

28%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

191
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

59

23%

LEVEL 3

93

35%

LEVEL 4

98

37%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

26
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

36

40%

LEVEL 2

29

32%

LEVEL 3

20

22%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

32

37%

LEVEL 2

35

40%

LEVEL 3

12

14%

LEVEL 4

8

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

190
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

32

11%

LEVEL 2

78

26%

LEVEL 3

112

37%

LEVEL 4

78

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

179
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

32

12%

LEVEL 2

67

24%

LEVEL 3

85

31%

LEVEL 4

94

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

18

25%

LEVEL 2

25

35%

LEVEL 3

21

29%

LEVEL 4

8

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

12

17%

LEVEL 2

27

38%

LEVEL 3

20

28%

LEVEL 4

12

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.