500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 144 COL JEROMUS REMSEN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to the State鈥檚 new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

258
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

38

10%

LEVEL 2

72

20%

LEVEL 3

102

28%

LEVEL 4

156

42%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

260
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

37

10%

LEVEL 2

67

18%

LEVEL 3

99

27%

LEVEL 4

161

44%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

127
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

18

10%

LEVEL 2

38

21%

LEVEL 3

53

29%

LEVEL 4

74

40%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

121
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

13

8%

LEVEL 2

32

19%

LEVEL 3

47

28%

LEVEL 4

74

45%

MALE

PROFICIENT

131
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

20

11%

LEVEL 2

34

18%

LEVEL 3

49

26%

LEVEL 4

82

44%

MALE

PROFICIENT

139
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

24

12%

LEVEL 2

35

18%

LEVEL 3

52

26%

LEVEL 4

87

44%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

26
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

11

38%

LEVEL 4

15

52%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

29
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

22

71%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

109
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

11

8%

LEVEL 2

19

14%

LEVEL 3

33

24%

LEVEL 4

76

55%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

112
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

12

9%

LEVEL 3

34

25%

LEVEL 4

78

58%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

91
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

11

9%

LEVEL 2

27

21%

LEVEL 3

38

29%

LEVEL 4

53

41%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

88
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

12

9%

LEVEL 2

29

22%

LEVEL 3

45

35%

LEVEL 4

43

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

12

20%

LEVEL 2

21

36%

LEVEL 3

15

25%

LEVEL 4

11

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

15

24%

LEVEL 2

22

35%

LEVEL 3

10

16%

LEVEL 4

16

25%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

249
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

22

7%

LEVEL 2

62

19%

LEVEL 3

95

29%

LEVEL 4

154

46%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

249
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

21

6%

LEVEL 2

55

17%

LEVEL 3

94

29%

LEVEL 4

155

48%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

16

46%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

7

20%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

16

41%

LEVEL 2

12

31%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

6

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

254
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

29

8%

LEVEL 2

70

20%

LEVEL 3

101

29%

LEVEL 4

153

43%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

258
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

31

9%

LEVEL 2

64

18%

LEVEL 3

98

28%

LEVEL 4

160

45%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

9

60%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

3

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

209
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

20

7%

LEVEL 2

54

19%

LEVEL 3

82

29%

LEVEL 4

127

45%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

210
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

19

7%

LEVEL 2

46

17%

LEVEL 3

77

28%

LEVEL 4

133

48%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

18

21%

LEVEL 2

18

21%

LEVEL 3

20

24%

LEVEL 4

29

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

18

20%

LEVEL 2

21

24%

LEVEL 3

22

25%

LEVEL 4

28

31%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.