500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 139 REGO PARK GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

211
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

66

19%

LEVEL 2

69

20%

LEVEL 3

92

27%

LEVEL 4

119

34%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

224
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

71

19%

LEVEL 2

76

20%

LEVEL 3

85

23%

LEVEL 4

139

37%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

32

20%

LEVEL 2

36

23%

LEVEL 3

42

26%

LEVEL 4

49

31%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

110
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

30

16%

LEVEL 2

46

25%

LEVEL 3

47

25%

LEVEL 4

63

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

120
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

34

18%

LEVEL 2

33

18%

LEVEL 3

50

27%

LEVEL 4

70

37%

MALE

PROFICIENT

114
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

41

22%

LEVEL 2

30

16%

LEVEL 3

38

21%

LEVEL 4

76

41%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

80
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

7

8%

LEVEL 3

27

29%

LEVEL 4

53

58%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

89
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

12

11%

LEVEL 2

7

6%

LEVEL 3

22

20%

LEVEL 4

67

62%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

76
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

31

23%

LEVEL 2

26

20%

LEVEL 3

32

24%

LEVEL 4

44

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

80
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

33

22%

LEVEL 2

37

25%

LEVEL 3

35

23%

LEVEL 4

45

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

43
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

25

25%

LEVEL 2

34

33%

LEVEL 3

27

26%

LEVEL 4

16

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

44
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

20

23%

LEVEL 2

24

27%

LEVEL 3

23

26%

LEVEL 4

21

24%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

186
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

50

17%

LEVEL 2

51

18%

LEVEL 3

78

27%

LEVEL 4

108

38%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

210
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

47

15%

LEVEL 2

64

20%

LEVEL 3

79

25%

LEVEL 4

131

41%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

25
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

16

27%

LEVEL 2

18

31%

LEVEL 3

14

24%

LEVEL 4

11

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

24

48%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

8

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

195
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

40

14%

LEVEL 2

53

18%

LEVEL 3

83

29%

LEVEL 4

112

39%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

209
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

37

12%

LEVEL 2

57

19%

LEVEL 3

75

25%

LEVEL 4

134

44%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

16
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

26

45%

LEVEL 2

16

28%

LEVEL 3

9

16%

LEVEL 4

7

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

15
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

34

50%

LEVEL 2

19

28%

LEVEL 3

10

15%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

13

10%

LEVEL 2

25

19%

LEVEL 3

38

29%

LEVEL 4

54

42%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

101
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

18

12%

LEVEL 2

31

21%

LEVEL 3

38

25%

LEVEL 4

63

42%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

119
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

53

25%

LEVEL 2

44

20%

LEVEL 3

54

25%

LEVEL 4

65

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

123
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

53

24%

LEVEL 2

45

20%

LEVEL 3

47

21%

LEVEL 4

76

34%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

222
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

66

18%

LEVEL 2

71

20%

LEVEL 3

84

23%

LEVEL 4

138

38%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.