500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 101 SCHOOL IN THE GARDENS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

188
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

21

7%

LEVEL 2

73

26%

LEVEL 3

106

38%

LEVEL 4

82

29%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

188
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

26

9%

LEVEL 2

84

28%

LEVEL 3

101

34%

LEVEL 4

87

29%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

105
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

27

20%

LEVEL 3

54

39%

LEVEL 4

51

37%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

34

24%

LEVEL 3

48

34%

LEVEL 4

51

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

83
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

15

10%

LEVEL 2

46

32%

LEVEL 3

52

36%

LEVEL 4

31

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

89
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

18

11%

LEVEL 2

50

32%

LEVEL 3

53

34%

LEVEL 4

36

23%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

63
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

19

22%

LEVEL 3

32

38%

LEVEL 4

31

36%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

70
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

20

21%

LEVEL 3

37

39%

LEVEL 4

33

34%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

89
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

36

27%

LEVEL 3

51

38%

LEVEL 4

38

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

81
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

45

34%

LEVEL 3

43

32%

LEVEL 4

38

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

6

14%

LEVEL 2

10

23%

LEVEL 3

19

44%

LEVEL 4

8

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

6

14%

LEVEL 2

11

26%

LEVEL 3

14

33%

LEVEL 4

11

26%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

177
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

63

25%

LEVEL 3

97

39%

LEVEL 4

80

32%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

69

26%

LEVEL 3

96

37%

LEVEL 4

84

32%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

11

34%

LEVEL 2

10

31%

LEVEL 3

9

28%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

13

36%

LEVEL 2

15

42%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

186
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

68

25%

LEVEL 3

106

39%

LEVEL 4

80

30%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

155
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

49

23%

LEVEL 3

83

39%

LEVEL 4

72

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

160
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

17

7%

LEVEL 2

64

27%

LEVEL 3

82

34%

LEVEL 4

78

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

10

15%

LEVEL 2

24

36%

LEVEL 3

23

34%

LEVEL 4

10

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

9

16%

LEVEL 2

20

35%

LEVEL 3

19

33%

LEVEL 4

9

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.