500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 99 KEW GARDENS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

263
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 459

LEVEL 1

58

13%

LEVEL 2

138

30%

LEVEL 3

133

29%

LEVEL 4

130

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

277
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 443

LEVEL 1

53

12%

LEVEL 2

113

26%

LEVEL 3

143

32%

LEVEL 4

134

30%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

129
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

28

13%

LEVEL 2

55

26%

LEVEL 3

64

30%

LEVEL 4

65

31%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

119
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

22

12%

LEVEL 2

49

26%

LEVEL 3

58

31%

LEVEL 4

61

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

134
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

30

12%

LEVEL 2

83

34%

LEVEL 3

69

28%

LEVEL 4

65

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

158
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

31

12%

LEVEL 2

64

25%

LEVEL 3

85

34%

LEVEL 4

73

29%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

75
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

30

28%

LEVEL 3

28

26%

LEVEL 4

47

43%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

83
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

7

6%

LEVEL 2

20

18%

LEVEL 3

34

31%

LEVEL 4

49

45%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

85
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

10

8%

LEVEL 2

32

25%

LEVEL 3

38

30%

LEVEL 4

47

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

84
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

10

8%

LEVEL 2

28

23%

LEVEL 3

38

31%

LEVEL 4

46

38%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

6

23%

LEVEL 2

9

35%

LEVEL 3

8

31%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

86
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

33

18%

LEVEL 2

64

35%

LEVEL 3

56

31%

LEVEL 4

30

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

95
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

29

16%

LEVEL 2

54

30%

LEVEL 3

62

35%

LEVEL 4

33

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

249
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

32

8%

LEVEL 2

102

27%

LEVEL 3

124

32%

LEVEL 4

125

33%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

263
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

23

6%

LEVEL 2

81

22%

LEVEL 3

132

36%

LEVEL 4

131

36%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

26

34%

LEVEL 2

36

47%

LEVEL 3

9

12%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

30

39%

LEVEL 2

32

42%

LEVEL 3

11

14%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

253
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

37

9%

LEVEL 2

116

29%

LEVEL 3

126

31%

LEVEL 4

127

31%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

269
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

37

9%

LEVEL 2

93

23%

LEVEL 3

139

35%

LEVEL 4

130

33%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

21

40%

LEVEL 2

22

42%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

16

36%

LEVEL 2

20

45%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

11

9%

LEVEL 2

29

22%

LEVEL 3

31

24%

LEVEL 4

58

45%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

29

23%

LEVEL 3

36

28%

LEVEL 4

55

43%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

174
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

47

14%

LEVEL 2

109

33%

LEVEL 3

102

31%

LEVEL 4

72

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

186
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

45

14%

LEVEL 2

84

27%

LEVEL 3

107

34%

LEVEL 4

79

25%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.