500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 196 GRAND CENTRAL PARKWAY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

292
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

41

12%

LEVEL 3

97

28%

LEVEL 4

195

56%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

310
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

38

11%

LEVEL 3

101

28%

LEVEL 4

209

58%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

159
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

25

13%

LEVEL 3

55

30%

LEVEL 4

104

56%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

171
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

18

9%

LEVEL 3

54

28%

LEVEL 4

117

60%

MALE

PROFICIENT

133
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

16

10%

LEVEL 3

42

26%

LEVEL 4

91

57%

MALE

PROFICIENT

139
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

20

12%

LEVEL 3

47

28%

LEVEL 4

92

55%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

18
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

2

10%

LEVEL 3

6

29%

LEVEL 4

12

57%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

24
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

12

48%

LEVEL 4

12

48%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

126
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

11

8%

LEVEL 3

31

22%

LEVEL 4

95

68%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

140
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

9

6%

LEVEL 3

34

23%

LEVEL 4

106

70%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

110
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

18

14%

LEVEL 3

47

36%

LEVEL 4

63

48%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

109
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

18

14%

LEVEL 3

41

31%

LEVEL 4

68

52%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

9

19%

LEVEL 3

13

27%

LEVEL 4

22

46%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

13

29%

LEVEL 4

20

44%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

274
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

28

9%

LEVEL 3

85

28%

LEVEL 4

189

62%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

283
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

29

9%

LEVEL 3

84

27%

LEVEL 4

199

63%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

9

23%

LEVEL 2

13

33%

LEVEL 3

12

30%

LEVEL 4

6

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

27
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

10

22%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

17

37%

LEVEL 4

10

22%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

280
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

34

11%

LEVEL 3

90

28%

LEVEL 4

190

59%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

298
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

33

10%

LEVEL 3

96

28%

LEVEL 4

202

59%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

6

24%

LEVEL 2

7

28%

LEVEL 3

7

28%

LEVEL 4

5

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

5

28%

LEVEL 4

7

39%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

217
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

19

8%

LEVEL 3

62

26%

LEVEL 4

155

65%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

248
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

25

9%

LEVEL 3

76

27%

LEVEL 4

172

62%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

10

9%

LEVEL 2

22

21%

LEVEL 3

35

33%

LEVEL 4

40

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

9

11%

LEVEL 2

13

15%

LEVEL 3

25

30%

LEVEL 4

37

44%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.