500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

CYNTHIA JENKINS SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

55
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

121

50%

LEVEL 2

68

28%

LEVEL 3

40

16%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

55
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

111

47%

LEVEL 2

72

30%

LEVEL 3

40

17%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

28
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

57

48%

LEVEL 2

34

29%

LEVEL 3

20

17%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

49

40%

LEVEL 2

43

35%

LEVEL 3

22

18%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

64

51%

LEVEL 2

34

27%

LEVEL 3

20

16%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

24
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

62

54%

LEVEL 2

29

25%

LEVEL 3

18

16%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

52
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

107

48%

LEVEL 2

62

28%

LEVEL 3

37

17%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

54
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

101

45%

LEVEL 2

68

30%

LEVEL 3

39

17%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

10

63%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

53
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

72

38%

LEVEL 2

63

34%

LEVEL 3

38

20%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

53
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

65

36%

LEVEL 2

65

36%

LEVEL 3

38

21%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

49

88%

LEVEL 2

5

9%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

46

84%

LEVEL 2

7

13%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

55
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

112

48%

LEVEL 2

66

28%

LEVEL 3

40

17%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

55
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

101

44%

LEVEL 2

71

31%

LEVEL 3

40

18%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

9

82%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

10

91%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

28

47%

LEVEL 2

12

20%

LEVEL 3

13

22%

LEVEL 4

7

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

24

41%

LEVEL 2

21

36%

LEVEL 3

9

15%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

93

51%

LEVEL 2

56

30%

LEVEL 3

27

15%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

87

49%

LEVEL 2

51

28%

LEVEL 3

31

17%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.