500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 176 CAMBRIA HEIGHTS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

198
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

46

14%

LEVEL 2

83

25%

LEVEL 3

114

35%

LEVEL 4

84

26%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

55

18%

LEVEL 2

74

24%

LEVEL 3

113

37%

LEVEL 4

61

20%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

109
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

19

11%

LEVEL 2

42

25%

LEVEL 3

54

32%

LEVEL 4

55

32%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

26

16%

LEVEL 2

34

21%

LEVEL 3

58

36%

LEVEL 4

41

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

89
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

27

17%

LEVEL 2

41

26%

LEVEL 3

60

38%

LEVEL 4

29

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

29

20%

LEVEL 2

40

28%

LEVEL 3

55

38%

LEVEL 4

20

14%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

6
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

3

18%

LEVEL 2

8

47%

LEVEL 3

6

35%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

22
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

8

33%

LEVEL 4

14

58%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

161
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

40

15%

LEVEL 2

73

27%

LEVEL 3

95

35%

LEVEL 4

66

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

144
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

47

19%

LEVEL 2

63

25%

LEVEL 3

92

36%

LEVEL 4

52

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

3

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

36

12%

LEVEL 2

71

24%

LEVEL 3

109

36%

LEVEL 4

84

28%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

171
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

39

14%

LEVEL 2

66

24%

LEVEL 3

110

40%

LEVEL 4

61

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

10

37%

LEVEL 2

12

44%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

16

59%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

6

7%

LEVEL 2

21

26%

LEVEL 3

26

32%

LEVEL 4

29

35%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

15

16%

LEVEL 2

27

29%

LEVEL 3

29

32%

LEVEL 4

21

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

143
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

40

16%

LEVEL 2

62

25%

LEVEL 3

88

36%

LEVEL 4

55

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

124
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

40

19%

LEVEL 2

47

22%

LEVEL 3

84

40%

LEVEL 4

40

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

194
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

45

14%

LEVEL 2

81

25%

LEVEL 3

112

35%

LEVEL 4

82

26%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

170
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

55

18%

LEVEL 2

73

24%

LEVEL 3

110

37%

LEVEL 4

60

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.