500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 176 CAMBRIA HEIGHTS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

55

16%

LEVEL 2

110

32%

LEVEL 3

120

35%

LEVEL 4

60

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

200
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

60

16%

LEVEL 2

108

29%

LEVEL 3

126

34%

LEVEL 4

74

20%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

119
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

16

9%

LEVEL 2

52

28%

LEVEL 3

74

40%

LEVEL 4

45

24%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

130
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

18

9%

LEVEL 2

55

27%

LEVEL 3

81

40%

LEVEL 4

49

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

39

25%

LEVEL 2

58

37%

LEVEL 3

46

29%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

42

25%

LEVEL 2

53

32%

LEVEL 3

45

27%

LEVEL 4

25

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

5

36%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

8

50%

LEVEL 4

7

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

165
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

55

17%

LEVEL 2

101

31%

LEVEL 3

112

35%

LEVEL 4

53

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

179
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

57

17%

LEVEL 2

103

30%

LEVEL 3

116

34%

LEVEL 4

63

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

30

10%

LEVEL 2

102

34%

LEVEL 3

113

37%

LEVEL 4

59

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

35

11%

LEVEL 2

93

29%

LEVEL 3

122

38%

LEVEL 4

74

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

25

61%

LEVEL 2

8

20%

LEVEL 3

7

17%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

25

57%

LEVEL 2

15

34%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

180
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

52

15%

LEVEL 2

106

31%

LEVEL 3

120

36%

LEVEL 4

60

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

199
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

54

15%

LEVEL 2

107

30%

LEVEL 3

125

35%

LEVEL 4

74

21%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

9

10%

LEVEL 2

27

30%

LEVEL 3

28

31%

LEVEL 4

26

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

9

9%

LEVEL 2

30

30%

LEVEL 3

39

39%

LEVEL 4

23

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

126
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

46

18%

LEVEL 2

83

33%

LEVEL 3

92

36%

LEVEL 4

34

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

138
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

51

19%

LEVEL 2

78

29%

LEVEL 3

87

33%

LEVEL 4

51

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.