500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

MERRICK ACADEMY-QUEENS PUBLIC CHARTE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

77

32%

LEVEL 2

91

37%

LEVEL 3

55

23%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

59
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

87

35%

LEVEL 2

104

42%

LEVEL 3

45

18%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

33
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

40

34%

LEVEL 2

44

38%

LEVEL 3

25

21%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

27
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

40

35%

LEVEL 2

48

42%

LEVEL 3

17

15%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

37

29%

LEVEL 2

47

37%

LEVEL 3

30

24%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

47

35%

LEVEL 2

56

41%

LEVEL 3

28

21%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

7

39%

LEVEL 4

4

22%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

61
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

72

34%

LEVEL 2

81

38%

LEVEL 3

46

21%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

50
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

83

37%

LEVEL 2

91

41%

LEVEL 3

38

17%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

64

29%

LEVEL 2

87

39%

LEVEL 3

52

24%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

54
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

69

31%

LEVEL 2

97

44%

LEVEL 3

42

19%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

13

59%

LEVEL 2

4

18%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

18

60%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

58
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

85

35%

LEVEL 2

102

42%

LEVEL 3

44

18%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

18

35%

LEVEL 2

17

33%

LEVEL 3

12

23%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

49

35%

LEVEL 2

55

39%

LEVEL 3

29

21%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

59

31%

LEVEL 2

74

39%

LEVEL 3

43

23%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

38

35%

LEVEL 2

49

45%

LEVEL 3

16

15%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.