500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

NYC GEOG DIST #30 - QUEENS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to the State鈥檚 new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

8,258
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 18,390

LEVEL 1

4,599

25%

LEVEL 2

5,533

30%

LEVEL 3

4,306

23%

LEVEL 4

3,952

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

9,142
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 17,959

LEVEL 1

4,279

24%

LEVEL 2

4,538

25%

LEVEL 3

4,321

24%

LEVEL 4

4,821

27%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

4,183
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,043

LEVEL 1

2,088

23%

LEVEL 2

2,772

31%

LEVEL 3

2,190

24%

LEVEL 4

1,993

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

4,562
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,779

LEVEL 1

1,985

23%

LEVEL 2

2,232

25%

LEVEL 3

2,215

25%

LEVEL 4

2,347

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

4,075
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,347

LEVEL 1

2,511

27%

LEVEL 2

2,761

30%

LEVEL 3

2,116

23%

LEVEL 4

1,959

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

4,580
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,180

LEVEL 1

2,294

25%

LEVEL 2

2,306

25%

LEVEL 3

2,106

23%

LEVEL 4

2,474

27%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

124
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

18

11%

LEVEL 2

28

16%

LEVEL 3

46

27%

LEVEL 4

78

46%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

147
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

17

9%

LEVEL 2

18

10%

LEVEL 3

46

25%

LEVEL 4

101

55%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

49
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

24

26%

LEVEL 2

21

22%

LEVEL 3

31

33%

LEVEL 4

18

19%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

56
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

33

29%

LEVEL 2

25

22%

LEVEL 3

24

21%

LEVEL 4

32

28%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2,755
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,074

LEVEL 1

429

11%

LEVEL 2

890

22%

LEVEL 3

1,064

26%

LEVEL 4

1,691

42%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2,936
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,967

LEVEL 1

387

10%

LEVEL 2

644

16%

LEVEL 3

975

25%

LEVEL 4

1,961

49%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,652
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,684

LEVEL 1

390

15%

LEVEL 2

642

24%

LEVEL 3

796

30%

LEVEL 4

856

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,856
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,729

LEVEL 1

367

13%

LEVEL 2

506

19%

LEVEL 3

784

29%

LEVEL 4

1,072

39%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

233
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,163

LEVEL 1

587

50%

LEVEL 2

343

29%

LEVEL 3

161

14%

LEVEL 4

72

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

278
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,105

LEVEL 1

540

49%

LEVEL 2

287

26%

LEVEL 3

173

16%

LEVEL 4

105

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3,445
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,205

LEVEL 1

3,151

31%

LEVEL 2

3,609

35%

LEVEL 3

2,208

22%

LEVEL 4

1,237

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3,869
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,862

LEVEL 1

2,935

30%

LEVEL 2

3,058

31%

LEVEL 3

2,319

24%

LEVEL 4

1,550

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

7,921
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,487

LEVEL 1

2,829

18%

LEVEL 2

4,737

31%

LEVEL 3

4,064

26%

LEVEL 4

3,857

25%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

8,687
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,071

LEVEL 1

2,562

17%

LEVEL 2

3,822

25%

LEVEL 3

4,009

27%

LEVEL 4

4,678

31%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

337
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,903

LEVEL 1

1,770

61%

LEVEL 2

796

27%

LEVEL 3

242

8%

LEVEL 4

95

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

455
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,888

LEVEL 1

1,717

59%

LEVEL 2

716

25%

LEVEL 3

312

11%

LEVEL 4

143

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7,891
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,462

LEVEL 1

2,972

19%

LEVEL 2

4,599

30%

LEVEL 3

4,017

26%

LEVEL 4

3,874

25%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8,603
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,923

LEVEL 1

2,658

18%

LEVEL 2

3,662

25%

LEVEL 3

3,915

26%

LEVEL 4

4,688

31%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

367
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,928

LEVEL 1

1,627

56%

LEVEL 2

934

32%

LEVEL 3

289

10%

LEVEL 4

78

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

539
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,036

LEVEL 1

1,621

53%

LEVEL 2

876

29%

LEVEL 3

406

13%

LEVEL 4

133

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,299
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,854

LEVEL 1

1,070

18%

LEVEL 2

1,485

25%

LEVEL 3

1,512

26%

LEVEL 4

1,787

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,902
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,356

LEVEL 1

624

14%

LEVEL 2

830

19%

LEVEL 3

1,161

27%

LEVEL 4

1,741

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4,959
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,536

LEVEL 1

3,529

28%

LEVEL 2

4,048

32%

LEVEL 3

2,794

22%

LEVEL 4

2,165

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6,240
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,603

LEVEL 1

3,655

27%

LEVEL 2

3,708

27%

LEVEL 3

3,160

23%

LEVEL 4

3,080

23%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.