500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 69 JACKSON HEIGHTS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to the State鈥檚 new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

296
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 535

LEVEL 1

77

14%

LEVEL 2

162

30%

LEVEL 3

149

28%

LEVEL 4

147

27%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

319
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 531

LEVEL 1

85

16%

LEVEL 2

127

24%

LEVEL 3

155

29%

LEVEL 4

164

31%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

145
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

38

14%

LEVEL 2

85

32%

LEVEL 3

75

28%

LEVEL 4

70

26%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

167
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

42

15%

LEVEL 2

65

24%

LEVEL 3

88

32%

LEVEL 4

79

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

151
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

39

15%

LEVEL 2

77

29%

LEVEL 3

74

28%

LEVEL 4

77

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

152
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

43

17%

LEVEL 2

62

24%

LEVEL 3

67

26%

LEVEL 4

85

33%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

184
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

23

9%

LEVEL 2

63

23%

LEVEL 3

79

29%

LEVEL 4

105

39%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

201
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

23

9%

LEVEL 2

45

17%

LEVEL 3

79

29%

LEVEL 4

122

45%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

21
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

3

10%

LEVEL 2

6

20%

LEVEL 3

12

40%

LEVEL 4

9

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

21
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

11

41%

LEVEL 4

10

37%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

83
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

51

23%

LEVEL 2

89

40%

LEVEL 3

55

25%

LEVEL 4

28

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

87
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

60

27%

LEVEL 2

74

33%

LEVEL 3

61

28%

LEVEL 4

26

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

291
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 493

LEVEL 1

56

11%

LEVEL 2

146

30%

LEVEL 3

145

29%

LEVEL 4

146

30%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

309
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 479

LEVEL 1

57

12%

LEVEL 2

113

24%

LEVEL 3

147

31%

LEVEL 4

162

34%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

21

50%

LEVEL 2

16

38%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

28

54%

LEVEL 2

14

27%

LEVEL 3

8

15%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

271
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

43

10%

LEVEL 2

133

30%

LEVEL 3

130

29%

LEVEL 4

141

32%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

294
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

38

9%

LEVEL 2

102

24%

LEVEL 3

136

31%

LEVEL 4

158

36%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

25
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

34

39%

LEVEL 2

29

33%

LEVEL 3

19

22%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

25
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

47

48%

LEVEL 2

25

26%

LEVEL 3

19

20%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

166
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

45

15%

LEVEL 2

93

31%

LEVEL 3

75

25%

LEVEL 4

91

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

115
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

22

13%

LEVEL 2

38

22%

LEVEL 3

54

31%

LEVEL 4

61

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

130
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

32

14%

LEVEL 2

69

30%

LEVEL 3

74

32%

LEVEL 4

56

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

204
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

63

18%

LEVEL 2

89

25%

LEVEL 3

101

28%

LEVEL 4

103

29%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.