500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 152 GWENDOLINE N ALLEYNE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to the State鈥檚 new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

343
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 612

LEVEL 1

102

17%

LEVEL 2

167

27%

LEVEL 3

167

27%

LEVEL 4

176

29%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

354
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 567

LEVEL 1

71

13%

LEVEL 2

142

25%

LEVEL 3

163

29%

LEVEL 4

191

34%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

170
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

45

15%

LEVEL 2

90

30%

LEVEL 3

86

28%

LEVEL 4

84

28%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

171
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

42

14%

LEVEL 2

77

27%

LEVEL 3

78

27%

LEVEL 4

93

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

173
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

57

19%

LEVEL 2

77

25%

LEVEL 3

81

26%

LEVEL 4

92

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

183
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

29

10%

LEVEL 2

65

23%

LEVEL 3

85

31%

LEVEL 4

98

35%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

217
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

29

9%

LEVEL 2

70

22%

LEVEL 3

93

29%

LEVEL 4

124

39%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

226
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

28

9%

LEVEL 2

56

18%

LEVEL 3

89

29%

LEVEL 4

137

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

13
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

4

20%

LEVEL 4

9

45%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

11
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

8

44%

LEVEL 4

3

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

104
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

68

26%

LEVEL 2

89

34%

LEVEL 3

66

25%

LEVEL 4

38

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

113
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

39

17%

LEVEL 2

80

34%

LEVEL 3

65

28%

LEVEL 4

48

21%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

326
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 532

LEVEL 1

62

12%

LEVEL 2

144

27%

LEVEL 3

154

29%

LEVEL 4

172

32%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

330
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 507

LEVEL 1

50

10%

LEVEL 2

127

25%

LEVEL 3

146

29%

LEVEL 4

184

36%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

40

50%

LEVEL 2

23

29%

LEVEL 3

13

16%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

21

35%

LEVEL 2

15

25%

LEVEL 3

17

28%

LEVEL 4

7

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

312
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

38

8%

LEVEL 2

127

27%

LEVEL 3

143

30%

LEVEL 4

169

35%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

310
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

29

7%

LEVEL 2

90

21%

LEVEL 3

133

31%

LEVEL 4

177

41%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

31
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

64

47%

LEVEL 2

40

30%

LEVEL 3

24

18%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

44
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

42

30%

LEVEL 2

52

38%

LEVEL 3

30

22%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

171
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

38

14%

LEVEL 2

56

21%

LEVEL 3

78

29%

LEVEL 4

93

35%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

10

9%

LEVEL 2

22

19%

LEVEL 3

32

28%

LEVEL 4

50

44%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

172
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

64

18%

LEVEL 2

111

32%

LEVEL 3

89

26%

LEVEL 4

83

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

272
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

61

13%

LEVEL 2

120

26%

LEVEL 3

131

29%

LEVEL 4

141

31%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.