500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 152 GWENDOLINE N ALLEYNE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

352
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 554

LEVEL 1

54

10%

LEVEL 2

148

27%

LEVEL 3

232

42%

LEVEL 4

120

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

273
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 483

LEVEL 1

62

13%

LEVEL 2

148

31%

LEVEL 3

182

38%

LEVEL 4

91

19%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

183
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

16

6%

LEVEL 2

85

30%

LEVEL 3

120

42%

LEVEL 4

63

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

151
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

24

10%

LEVEL 2

67

28%

LEVEL 3

104

43%

LEVEL 4

47

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

169
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

38

14%

LEVEL 2

63

23%

LEVEL 3

112

41%

LEVEL 4

57

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

122
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

38

16%

LEVEL 2

81

34%

LEVEL 3

78

32%

LEVEL 4

44

18%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

228
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

16

5%

LEVEL 2

58

19%

LEVEL 3

137

45%

LEVEL 4

91

30%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

160
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

17

7%

LEVEL 2

64

27%

LEVEL 3

97

40%

LEVEL 4

63

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

11
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

10

56%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

11

52%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

109
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

35

15%

LEVEL 2

83

37%

LEVEL 3

84

37%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

99
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

40

19%

LEVEL 2

73

34%

LEVEL 3

75

35%

LEVEL 4

24

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

338
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 494

LEVEL 1

23

5%

LEVEL 2

133

27%

LEVEL 3

219

44%

LEVEL 4

119

24%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

259
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

26

6%

LEVEL 2

133

32%

LEVEL 3

170

41%

LEVEL 4

89

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

31

52%

LEVEL 2

15

25%

LEVEL 3

13

22%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

36

55%

LEVEL 2

15

23%

LEVEL 3

12

18%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

318
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

14

3%

LEVEL 2

97

23%

LEVEL 3

200

47%

LEVEL 4

118

28%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

260
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

25

6%

LEVEL 2

112

28%

LEVEL 3

170

43%

LEVEL 4

90

23%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

34
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

40

32%

LEVEL 2

51

41%

LEVEL 3

32

26%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

13
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

37

43%

LEVEL 2

36

42%

LEVEL 3

12

14%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

26

24%

LEVEL 3

46

42%

LEVEL 4

33

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

24

25%

LEVEL 3

48

49%

LEVEL 4

19

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

273
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

49

11%

LEVEL 2

122

27%

LEVEL 3

186

42%

LEVEL 4

87

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

206
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

56

15%

LEVEL 2

124

32%

LEVEL 3

134

35%

LEVEL 4

72

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

274
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

36

9%

LEVEL 2

113

27%

LEVEL 3

180

43%

LEVEL 4

94

22%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

221
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

38

10%

LEVEL 2

117

31%

LEVEL 3

149

40%

LEVEL 4

72

19%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

78
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

18

14%

LEVEL 2

35

27%

LEVEL 3

52

40%

LEVEL 4

26

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

52
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

24

22%

LEVEL 2

31

29%

LEVEL 3

33

31%

LEVEL 4

19

18%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.