500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 149 CHRISTA MCAULIFFE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

252
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 616

LEVEL 1

176

29%

LEVEL 2

188

31%

LEVEL 3

165

27%

LEVEL 4

87

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

256
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 577

LEVEL 1

159

28%

LEVEL 2

162

28%

LEVEL 3

161

28%

LEVEL 4

95

16%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

126
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

89

28%

LEVEL 2

101

32%

LEVEL 3

85

27%

LEVEL 4

41

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

125
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

84

28%

LEVEL 2

88

30%

LEVEL 3

79

27%

LEVEL 4

46

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

126
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

87

29%

LEVEL 2

87

29%

LEVEL 3

80

27%

LEVEL 4

46

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

131
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

75

27%

LEVEL 2

74

26%

LEVEL 3

82

29%

LEVEL 4

49

18%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

33
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

18

40%

LEVEL 4

15

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

32
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

4

9%

LEVEL 2

8

18%

LEVEL 3

16

36%

LEVEL 4

16

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

17
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

2

10%

LEVEL 3

8

38%

LEVEL 4

9

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

14
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

8

53%

LEVEL 4

6

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

199
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 541

LEVEL 1

167

31%

LEVEL 2

175

32%

LEVEL 3

138

26%

LEVEL 4

61

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

207
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 508

LEVEL 1

150

30%

LEVEL 2

151

30%

LEVEL 3

135

27%

LEVEL 4

72

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

243
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 531

LEVEL 1

127

24%

LEVEL 2

161

30%

LEVEL 3

159

30%

LEVEL 4

84

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

245
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 472

LEVEL 1

97

21%

LEVEL 2

130

28%

LEVEL 3

153

32%

LEVEL 4

92

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

49

58%

LEVEL 2

27

32%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

62

59%

LEVEL 2

32

30%

LEVEL 3

8

8%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

213
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

74

18%

LEVEL 2

129

31%

LEVEL 3

133

32%

LEVEL 4

80

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

210
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

61

16%

LEVEL 2

103

28%

LEVEL 3

122

33%

LEVEL 4

88

24%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

39
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

102

51%

LEVEL 2

59

30%

LEVEL 3

32

16%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

46
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

98

48%

LEVEL 2

59

29%

LEVEL 3

39

19%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

27

23%

LEVEL 2

37

31%

LEVEL 3

31

26%

LEVEL 4

24

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

29

24%

LEVEL 2

27

22%

LEVEL 3

33

27%

LEVEL 4

34

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

197
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 497

LEVEL 1

149

30%

LEVEL 2

151

30%

LEVEL 3

134

27%

LEVEL 4

63

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

189
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

130

29%

LEVEL 2

135

30%

LEVEL 3

128

28%

LEVEL 4

61

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

207
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 487

LEVEL 1

133

27%

LEVEL 2

147

30%

LEVEL 3

129

26%

LEVEL 4

78

16%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

216
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 460

LEVEL 1

112

24%

LEVEL 2

132

29%

LEVEL 3

138

30%

LEVEL 4

78

17%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

45
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

43

33%

LEVEL 2

41

32%

LEVEL 3

36

28%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

40
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

47

40%

LEVEL 2

30

26%

LEVEL 3

23

20%

LEVEL 4

17

15%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.