500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 148 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

145

33%

LEVEL 2

137

31%

LEVEL 3

97

22%

LEVEL 4

58

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

122

33%

LEVEL 2

110

30%

LEVEL 3

83

22%

LEVEL 4

57

15%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

75

33%

LEVEL 2

80

36%

LEVEL 3

44

20%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

56

32%

LEVEL 2

56

32%

LEVEL 3

41

23%

LEVEL 4

24

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

70

33%

LEVEL 2

57

27%

LEVEL 3

53

25%

LEVEL 4

33

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

66

34%

LEVEL 2

54

28%

LEVEL 3

42

22%

LEVEL 4

33

17%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

31
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

12

18%

LEVEL 2

22

34%

LEVEL 3

12

18%

LEVEL 4

19

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

22
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

5

11%

LEVEL 2

19

41%

LEVEL 3

11

24%

LEVEL 4

11

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

117
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

128

36%

LEVEL 2

114

32%

LEVEL 3

83

23%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

112
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

117

37%

LEVEL 2

87

28%

LEVEL 3

71

22%

LEVEL 4

41

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

120

33%

LEVEL 2

110

30%

LEVEL 3

86

23%

LEVEL 4

50

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

118
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

91

31%

LEVEL 2

89

30%

LEVEL 3

70

23%

LEVEL 4

48

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

25

35%

LEVEL 2

27

38%

LEVEL 3

11

15%

LEVEL 4

8

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

22
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

31

42%

LEVEL 2

21

28%

LEVEL 3

13

18%

LEVEL 4

9

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

143
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

53

18%

LEVEL 2

102

34%

LEVEL 3

88

30%

LEVEL 4

55

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

129
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

57

22%

LEVEL 2

76

29%

LEVEL 3

75

29%

LEVEL 4

54

21%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

92

66%

LEVEL 2

35

25%

LEVEL 3

9

6%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

65

59%

LEVEL 2

34

31%

LEVEL 3

8

7%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

23

31%

LEVEL 2

21

28%

LEVEL 3

19

26%

LEVEL 4

11

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

29

41%

LEVEL 2

16

23%

LEVEL 3

16

23%

LEVEL 4

9

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

125
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

122

34%

LEVEL 2

116

32%

LEVEL 3

78

21%

LEVEL 4

47

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

115
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

93

31%

LEVEL 2

94

31%

LEVEL 3

67

22%

LEVEL 4

48

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

139
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

120

32%

LEVEL 2

121

32%

LEVEL 3

85

22%

LEVEL 4

54

14%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

123
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

107

33%

LEVEL 2

93

29%

LEVEL 3

70

22%

LEVEL 4

53

16%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

16
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

25

44%

LEVEL 2

16

28%

LEVEL 3

12

21%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

17
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

15

31%

LEVEL 2

17

35%

LEVEL 3

13

27%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.