500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 148 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

119

26%

LEVEL 2

195

43%

LEVEL 3

91

20%

LEVEL 4

45

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 455

LEVEL 1

118

26%

LEVEL 2

174

38%

LEVEL 3

108

24%

LEVEL 4

55

12%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

66
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

56

24%

LEVEL 2

115

49%

LEVEL 3

48

20%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

65

29%

LEVEL 2

89

40%

LEVEL 3

45

20%

LEVEL 4

23

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

63

30%

LEVEL 2

80

38%

LEVEL 3

43

20%

LEVEL 4

27

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

95
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

53

23%

LEVEL 2

85

36%

LEVEL 3

63

27%

LEVEL 4

32

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

28
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

9

17%

LEVEL 2

15

29%

LEVEL 3

10

19%

LEVEL 4

18

35%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

32
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

8

14%

LEVEL 2

17

30%

LEVEL 3

17

30%

LEVEL 4

15

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

6

35%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

6

43%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

102
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

102

27%

LEVEL 2

169

45%

LEVEL 3

75

20%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

123
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

106

28%

LEVEL 2

149

39%

LEVEL 3

84

22%

LEVEL 4

39

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

126
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

97

25%

LEVEL 2

168

43%

LEVEL 3

86

22%

LEVEL 4

40

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

96

24%

LEVEL 2

149

38%

LEVEL 3

95

24%

LEVEL 4

52

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

22

37%

LEVEL 2

27

46%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

22

35%

LEVEL 2

25

40%

LEVEL 3

13

21%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

126
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

59

17%

LEVEL 2

154

45%

LEVEL 3

85

25%

LEVEL 4

41

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

147
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

66

19%

LEVEL 2

143

40%

LEVEL 3

97

27%

LEVEL 4

50

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

60

54%

LEVEL 2

41

37%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

16
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

52

53%

LEVEL 2

31

31%

LEVEL 3

11

11%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

36

23%

LEVEL 2

57

36%

LEVEL 3

46

29%

LEVEL 4

18

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

82

28%

LEVEL 2

117

39%

LEVEL 3

62

21%

LEVEL 4

37

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.