500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

IS 204 OLIVER W HOLMES GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

170

41%

LEVEL 2

161

39%

LEVEL 3

56

13%

LEVEL 4

29

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 476

LEVEL 1

215

45%

LEVEL 2

156

33%

LEVEL 3

70

15%

LEVEL 4

35

7%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

76

42%

LEVEL 2

68

37%

LEVEL 3

27

15%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

90

41%

LEVEL 2

83

38%

LEVEL 3

25

11%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

94

40%

LEVEL 2

93

40%

LEVEL 3

29

12%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

125

48%

LEVEL 2

73

28%

LEVEL 3

45

17%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

36
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

13

16%

LEVEL 2

32

40%

LEVEL 3

19

23%

LEVEL 4

17

21%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

48
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

16

17%

LEVEL 2

29

31%

LEVEL 3

29

31%

LEVEL 4

19

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

53

69%

LEVEL 2

22

29%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

63

66%

LEVEL 2

26

27%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

40
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

93

40%

LEVEL 2

98

42%

LEVEL 3

29

13%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

43
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

126

47%

LEVEL 2

98

37%

LEVEL 3

30

11%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

86

29%

LEVEL 2

129

43%

LEVEL 3

54

18%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

115

33%

LEVEL 2

133

38%

LEVEL 3

68

19%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

84

71%

LEVEL 2

32

27%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

100

80%

LEVEL 2

23

18%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

75
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

144

40%

LEVEL 2

137

38%

LEVEL 3

52

15%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

99
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

172

42%

LEVEL 2

141

34%

LEVEL 3

65

16%

LEVEL 4

34

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

26

43%

LEVEL 2

24

40%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

43

67%

LEVEL 2

15

23%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

7

58%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

53

49%

LEVEL 2

33

30%

LEVEL 3

13

12%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

166

41%

LEVEL 2

154

38%

LEVEL 3

56

14%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

162

44%

LEVEL 2

123

34%

LEVEL 3

57

16%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.