500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

QUEENS GATEWAY-HEALTH SCIENCES GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

227
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

22

9%

LEVEL 3

87

34%

LEVEL 4

140

54%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

237
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

17

7%

LEVEL 3

81

31%

LEVEL 4

156

60%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

123
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

9

7%

LEVEL 3

45

33%

LEVEL 4

78

58%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

124
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

8

6%

LEVEL 3

34

25%

LEVEL 4

90

67%

MALE

PROFICIENT

104
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

13

11%

LEVEL 3

42

34%

LEVEL 4

62

50%

MALE

PROFICIENT

113
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

9

7%

LEVEL 3

47

37%

LEVEL 4

66

52%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

16
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

9

50%

LEVEL 4

7

39%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

12
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

8

53%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

133
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

11

7%

LEVEL 3

42

29%

LEVEL 4

91

62%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

147
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

6

4%

LEVEL 3

51

33%

LEVEL 4

96

62%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

56
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

4

6%

LEVEL 2

10

14%

LEVEL 3

26

37%

LEVEL 4

30

43%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

57
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

4

6%

LEVEL 2

6

9%

LEVEL 3

19

28%

LEVEL 4

38

57%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

8

44%

LEVEL 4

9

50%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

11

69%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

225
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

18

7%

LEVEL 3

85

35%

LEVEL 4

140

57%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

234
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

11

4%

LEVEL 3

78

32%

LEVEL 4

156

64%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

7

54%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

7

44%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

10

12%

LEVEL 3

27

32%

LEVEL 4

45

54%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

90
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

7

7%

LEVEL 3

29

29%

LEVEL 4

61

61%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

155
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

12

7%

LEVEL 3

60

34%

LEVEL 4

95

55%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

147
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

10

6%

LEVEL 3

52

32%

LEVEL 4

95

59%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.