500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 8 SHIRLEE SOLOMON GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

220
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

56

20%

LEVEL 3

120

42%

LEVEL 4

100

35%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

206
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

22

8%

LEVEL 2

48

17%

LEVEL 3

95

34%

LEVEL 4

111

40%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

20

14%

LEVEL 3

54

39%

LEVEL 4

61

44%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

108
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

17

13%

LEVEL 3

39

30%

LEVEL 4

69

53%

MALE

PROFICIENT

105
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

36

24%

LEVEL 3

66

45%

LEVEL 4

39

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

98
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

17

12%

LEVEL 2

31

21%

LEVEL 3

56

38%

LEVEL 4

42

29%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

27
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

3

10%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

20

65%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

171
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

35

17%

LEVEL 3

100

47%

LEVEL 4

71

34%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

156
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

31

16%

LEVEL 3

76

38%

LEVEL 4

80

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

5

12%

LEVEL 2

17

40%

LEVEL 3

12

28%

LEVEL 4

9

21%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

9

24%

LEVEL 2

13

34%

LEVEL 3

9

24%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

209
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

37

15%

LEVEL 3

110

44%

LEVEL 4

99

40%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

35

15%

LEVEL 3

86

36%

LEVEL 4

110

46%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

7

19%

LEVEL 2

19

51%

LEVEL 3

10

27%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

14

38%

LEVEL 2

13

35%

LEVEL 3

9

24%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

217
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

52

19%

LEVEL 3

117

42%

LEVEL 4

100

36%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

163
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

21

11%

LEVEL 3

82

44%

LEVEL 4

81

44%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

153
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

21

11%

LEVEL 3

69

38%

LEVEL 4

84

46%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

8

8%

LEVEL 2

35

35%

LEVEL 3

38

38%

LEVEL 4

19

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

12

13%

LEVEL 2

27

29%

LEVEL 3

26

28%

LEVEL 4

27

29%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

203
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

47

17%

LEVEL 3

93

34%

LEVEL 4

110

41%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.