500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 6 CPL ALLAN F KIVLEHAN SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

42

17%

LEVEL 2

57

23%

LEVEL 3

74

30%

LEVEL 4

72

29%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

32

13%

LEVEL 2

61

24%

LEVEL 3

87

34%

LEVEL 4

74

29%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

20

17%

LEVEL 2

28

24%

LEVEL 3

38

32%

LEVEL 4

33

28%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

62
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

16

14%

LEVEL 2

37

32%

LEVEL 3

32

28%

LEVEL 4

30

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

22

17%

LEVEL 2

29

23%

LEVEL 3

36

29%

LEVEL 4

39

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

16

12%

LEVEL 2

24

17%

LEVEL 3

55

40%

LEVEL 4

44

32%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

60%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

125
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

29

15%

LEVEL 2

42

21%

LEVEL 3

60

31%

LEVEL 4

65

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

136
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

22

11%

LEVEL 2

49

24%

LEVEL 3

73

35%

LEVEL 4

63

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

10

29%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

12

35%

LEVEL 4

4

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

8

22%

LEVEL 2

9

25%

LEVEL 3

13

36%

LEVEL 4

6

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

35

21%

LEVEL 3

60

36%

LEVEL 4

65

38%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

135
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

35

20%

LEVEL 3

68

39%

LEVEL 4

67

38%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

21
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

33

43%

LEVEL 2

22

29%

LEVEL 3

14

18%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

26
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

27

34%

LEVEL 2

26

33%

LEVEL 3

19

24%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

146
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

36

15%

LEVEL 2

55

23%

LEVEL 3

74

31%

LEVEL 4

72

30%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

161
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

28

11%

LEVEL 2

58

23%

LEVEL 3

87

35%

LEVEL 4

74

30%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

106
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

33

22%

LEVEL 3

52

34%

LEVEL 4

54

36%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

100
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

12

9%

LEVEL 2

28

20%

LEVEL 3

46

33%

LEVEL 4

54

39%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

29

31%

LEVEL 2

24

26%

LEVEL 3

22

24%

LEVEL 4

18

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

20

18%

LEVEL 2

33

29%

LEVEL 3

41

36%

LEVEL 4

20

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

143
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

37

16%

LEVEL 2

56

24%

LEVEL 3

72

31%

LEVEL 4

71

30%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.