500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 3 MARGARET GIOIOSA SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the . This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

233
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 498

LEVEL 1

82

16%

LEVEL 2

183

37%

LEVEL 3

174

35%

LEVEL 4

59

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

250
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 501

LEVEL 1

87

17%

LEVEL 2

164

33%

LEVEL 3

173

35%

LEVEL 4

77

15%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

126
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

37

14%

LEVEL 2

98

38%

LEVEL 3

90

34%

LEVEL 4

36

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

137
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

34

13%

LEVEL 2

88

34%

LEVEL 3

88

34%

LEVEL 4

49

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

107
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

45

19%

LEVEL 2

85

36%

LEVEL 3

84

35%

LEVEL 4

23

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

113
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

53

22%

LEVEL 2

76

31%

LEVEL 3

85

35%

LEVEL 4

28

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

22
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

3

10%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

15

48%

LEVEL 4

7

23%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

22
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

13

45%

LEVEL 4

9

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

186
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

66

16%

LEVEL 2

171

40%

LEVEL 3

141

33%

LEVEL 4

45

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

204
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

75

18%

LEVEL 2

146

34%

LEVEL 3

145

34%

LEVEL 4

59

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

12

32%

LEVEL 2

3

8%

LEVEL 3

15

41%

LEVEL 4

7

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

10

25%

LEVEL 2

11

28%

LEVEL 3

11

28%

LEVEL 4

8

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

220
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

33

8%

LEVEL 2

165

39%

LEVEL 3

162

39%

LEVEL 4

58

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

238
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

32

8%

LEVEL 2

130

33%

LEVEL 3

163

41%

LEVEL 4

75

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

49

61%

LEVEL 2

18

23%

LEVEL 3

12

15%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

55

54%

LEVEL 2

34

34%

LEVEL 3

10

10%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

179
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

35

11%

LEVEL 2

113

35%

LEVEL 3

134

41%

LEVEL 4

45

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

194
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

44

13%

LEVEL 2

107

31%

LEVEL 3

129

37%

LEVEL 4

65

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

47

27%

LEVEL 2

70

41%

LEVEL 3

40

23%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

43

28%

LEVEL 2

57

37%

LEVEL 3

44

28%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.