500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 29 BARDWELL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

201
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

62

16%

LEVEL 2

137

34%

LEVEL 3

118

30%

LEVEL 4

83

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

205
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

65

17%

LEVEL 2

117

30%

LEVEL 3

106

27%

LEVEL 4

99

26%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

97
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

31

15%

LEVEL 2

78

38%

LEVEL 3

61

30%

LEVEL 4

36

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

28

15%

LEVEL 2

68

35%

LEVEL 3

51

27%

LEVEL 4

45

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

104
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

31

16%

LEVEL 2

59

30%

LEVEL 3

57

29%

LEVEL 4

47

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

109
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

37

19%

LEVEL 2

49

25%

LEVEL 3

55

28%

LEVEL 4

54

28%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

43
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

12

21%

LEVEL 3

20

34%

LEVEL 4

23

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

44
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

9

16%

LEVEL 3

21

38%

LEVEL 4

23

41%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

131
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

23

10%

LEVEL 2

74

32%

LEVEL 3

82

36%

LEVEL 4

49

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

119
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

29

13%

LEVEL 2

73

33%

LEVEL 3

58

26%

LEVEL 4

61

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

21

30%

LEVEL 2

31

44%

LEVEL 3

12

17%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

23

31%

LEVEL 2

19

26%

LEVEL 3

19

26%

LEVEL 4

13

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

195
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

37

11%

LEVEL 2

99

30%

LEVEL 3

113

34%

LEVEL 4

82

25%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

194
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

31

10%

LEVEL 2

90

29%

LEVEL 3

97

31%

LEVEL 4

97

31%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

25

36%

LEVEL 2

38

55%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

34

47%

LEVEL 2

27

38%

LEVEL 3

9

13%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

200
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

59

15%

LEVEL 2

132

34%

LEVEL 3

118

30%

LEVEL 4

82

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

203
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

61

16%

LEVEL 2

115

30%

LEVEL 3

104

27%

LEVEL 4

99

26%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

132
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

16

8%

LEVEL 2

65

31%

LEVEL 3

75

35%

LEVEL 4

57

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

133
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

19

9%

LEVEL 2

55

27%

LEVEL 3

63

30%

LEVEL 4

70

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

46

25%

LEVEL 2

72

39%

LEVEL 3

43

23%

LEVEL 4

26

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

46

26%

LEVEL 2

62

34%

LEVEL 3

43

24%

LEVEL 4

29

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.