500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 18 JOHN G WHITTIER GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

38
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

140

51%

LEVEL 2

96

35%

LEVEL 3

34

12%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

26
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

152

58%

LEVEL 2

84

32%

LEVEL 3

23

9%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

15
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

60

50%

LEVEL 2

46

38%

LEVEL 3

14

12%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

17
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

64

51%

LEVEL 2

45

36%

LEVEL 3

15

12%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

23
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

80

52%

LEVEL 2

50

33%

LEVEL 3

20

13%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

9
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

88

65%

LEVEL 2

39

29%

LEVEL 3

8

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

13

68%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

64

51%

LEVEL 2

43

34%

LEVEL 3

17

13%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

76

62%

LEVEL 2

33

27%

LEVEL 3

10

8%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

58

48%

LEVEL 2

49

40%

LEVEL 3

13

11%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

63

54%

LEVEL 2

43

37%

LEVEL 3

10

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

38
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

58

34%

LEVEL 2

75

44%

LEVEL 3

34

20%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

25
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

65

44%

LEVEL 2

59

40%

LEVEL 3

22

15%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

82

80%

LEVEL 2

21

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

87

77%

LEVEL 2

25

22%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

37
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

134

50%

LEVEL 2

95

36%

LEVEL 3

33

12%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

26
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

148

58%

LEVEL 2

83

32%

LEVEL 3

23

9%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

29

54%

LEVEL 2

16

30%

LEVEL 3

8

15%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

123

59%

LEVEL 2

68

33%

LEVEL 3

15

7%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.