500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 16 JOHN J DRISCOLL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

37
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

184

58%

LEVEL 2

95

30%

LEVEL 3

35

11%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

55
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

150

50%

LEVEL 2

98

32%

LEVEL 3

46

15%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

25
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

86

53%

LEVEL 2

52

32%

LEVEL 3

24

15%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

34
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

65

44%

LEVEL 2

49

33%

LEVEL 3

28

19%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

12
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

98

64%

LEVEL 2

43

28%

LEVEL 3

11

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

21
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

85

55%

LEVEL 2

49

32%

LEVEL 3

18

12%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

29

66%

LEVEL 2

10

23%

LEVEL 3

5

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

19

63%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

39

56%

LEVEL 2

21

30%

LEVEL 3

9

13%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

45

52%

LEVEL 2

26

30%

LEVEL 3

13

15%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

108

60%

LEVEL 2

54

30%

LEVEL 3

16

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

82

48%

LEVEL 2

62

36%

LEVEL 3

24

14%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

35
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

101

47%

LEVEL 2

79

37%

LEVEL 3

33

15%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

51
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

70

34%

LEVEL 2

86

42%

LEVEL 3

43

21%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

83

82%

LEVEL 2

16

16%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

80

83%

LEVEL 2

12

13%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

36
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

114

49%

LEVEL 2

84

36%

LEVEL 3

34

15%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

55
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

103

42%

LEVEL 2

86

35%

LEVEL 3

46

19%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

70

85%

LEVEL 2

11

13%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

47

80%

LEVEL 2

12

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

8

53%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

182

60%

LEVEL 2

87

29%

LEVEL 3

30

10%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

146

51%

LEVEL 2

93

32%

LEVEL 3

41

14%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.