500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 35 CLOVE VALLEY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

27

13%

LEVEL 3

59

29%

LEVEL 4

111

55%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

19

10%

LEVEL 3

57

31%

LEVEL 4

105

56%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

11

12%

LEVEL 3

23

25%

LEVEL 4

53

58%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

10

11%

LEVEL 3

19

21%

LEVEL 4

57

63%

MALE

PROFICIENT

94
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

16

14%

LEVEL 3

36

32%

LEVEL 4

58

52%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

9

9%

LEVEL 3

38

40%

LEVEL 4

48

50%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

5

63%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

20
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

3

13%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

18

75%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

9

43%

LEVEL 4

12

57%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

101
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

8

7%

LEVEL 3

33

30%

LEVEL 4

68

61%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

91
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

7

7%

LEVEL 3

26

26%

LEVEL 4

65

66%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

6

32%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

8

42%

LEVEL 4

6

32%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

31
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

8

20%

LEVEL 3

17

41%

LEVEL 4

14

34%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

7

19%

LEVEL 3

12

33%

LEVEL 4

15

42%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

15

10%

LEVEL 3

36

23%

LEVEL 4

101

65%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

7

5%

LEVEL 3

45

31%

LEVEL 4

92

63%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

33
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

12

26%

LEVEL 3

23

49%

LEVEL 4

10

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

25
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

12

30%

LEVEL 3

12

30%

LEVEL 4

13

33%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

157
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

19

10%

LEVEL 3

54

30%

LEVEL 4

103

57%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

107
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

13

11%

LEVEL 3

34

28%

LEVEL 4

73

60%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

109
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

8

7%

LEVEL 3

31

26%

LEVEL 4

78

66%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

5

6%

LEVEL 2

14

17%

LEVEL 3

25

30%

LEVEL 4

38

46%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

11

16%

LEVEL 3

26

39%

LEVEL 4

27

40%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

166
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

26

13%

LEVEL 3

56

28%

LEVEL 4

110

56%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

158
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

18

10%

LEVEL 3

55

30%

LEVEL 4

103

57%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.