500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 50 FRANK HANKINSON GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to the State鈥檚 new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

318
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

46

11%

LEVEL 2

62

15%

LEVEL 3

113

27%

LEVEL 4

205

48%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

314
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

36

9%

LEVEL 2

51

13%

LEVEL 3

96

24%

LEVEL 4

218

54%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

166
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

24

11%

LEVEL 2

36

16%

LEVEL 3

53

23%

LEVEL 4

113

50%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

164
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

14

7%

LEVEL 2

28

14%

LEVEL 3

52

25%

LEVEL 4

112

54%

MALE

PROFICIENT

152
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

22

11%

LEVEL 2

26

13%

LEVEL 3

60

30%

LEVEL 4

92

46%

MALE

PROFICIENT

150
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

22

11%

LEVEL 2

23

12%

LEVEL 3

44

23%

LEVEL 4

106

54%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

38
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

3

7%

LEVEL 3

8

19%

LEVEL 4

30

70%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

53
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

2

4%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

46

82%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

230
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

26

8%

LEVEL 2

50

16%

LEVEL 3

82

27%

LEVEL 4

148

48%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

207
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

22

8%

LEVEL 2

32

12%

LEVEL 3

67

26%

LEVEL 4

140

54%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

4

40%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

14

25%

LEVEL 2

7

13%

LEVEL 3

18

32%

LEVEL 4

17

30%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

44
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

7

10%

LEVEL 2

17

25%

LEVEL 3

20

29%

LEVEL 4

24

35%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

302
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

34

10%

LEVEL 3

100

29%

LEVEL 4

202

59%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

298
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

22

7%

LEVEL 3

85

26%

LEVEL 4

213

65%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

40

48%

LEVEL 2

28

33%

LEVEL 3

13

15%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

29

39%

LEVEL 2

29

39%

LEVEL 3

11

15%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

314
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

43

10%

LEVEL 2

61

15%

LEVEL 3

112

27%

LEVEL 4

202

48%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

305
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

36

9%

LEVEL 2

48

12%

LEVEL 3

93

24%

LEVEL 4

212

54%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

6

50%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

233
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

36

13%

LEVEL 3

78

27%

LEVEL 4

155

54%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

204
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

21

9%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

150

63%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

28

20%

LEVEL 2

26

19%

LEVEL 3

35

25%

LEVEL 4

50

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

110
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

23

14%

LEVEL 2

30

18%

LEVEL 3

42

26%

LEVEL 4

68

42%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.