500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 50 FRANK HANKINSON GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

310
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

30

7%

LEVEL 2

67

16%

LEVEL 3

149

37%

LEVEL 4

161

40%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

279
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

19

5%

LEVEL 2

57

16%

LEVEL 3

142

40%

LEVEL 4

137

39%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

174
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

27

13%

LEVEL 3

72

34%

LEVEL 4

102

49%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

157
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

23

12%

LEVEL 3

80

42%

LEVEL 4

77

41%

MALE

PROFICIENT

136
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

21

11%

LEVEL 2

40

20%

LEVEL 3

77

39%

LEVEL 4

59

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

122
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

34

20%

LEVEL 3

62

37%

LEVEL 4

60

36%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

50
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

2

4%

LEVEL 3

21

38%

LEVEL 4

29

53%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

47
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

6

11%

LEVEL 3

20

37%

LEVEL 4

27

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

203
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

22

8%

LEVEL 2

42

16%

LEVEL 3

94

35%

LEVEL 4

109

41%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

181
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

28

13%

LEVEL 3

97

44%

LEVEL 4

84

39%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

47
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

4

6%

LEVEL 2

18

26%

LEVEL 3

27

39%

LEVEL 4

20

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

43
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

6

8%

LEVEL 2

22

31%

LEVEL 3

22

31%

LEVEL 4

21

30%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

289
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

33

10%

LEVEL 3

130

40%

LEVEL 4

159

49%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

260
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

31

11%

LEVEL 3

128

44%

LEVEL 4

132

45%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

21
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

26

32%

LEVEL 2

34

42%

LEVEL 3

19

23%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

17

27%

LEVEL 2

26

42%

LEVEL 3

14

23%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

304
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

27

7%

LEVEL 2

64

16%

LEVEL 3

143

36%

LEVEL 4

161

41%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

6

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

198
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

28

12%

LEVEL 3

91

38%

LEVEL 4

107

44%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

155
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

25

13%

LEVEL 3

72

39%

LEVEL 4

83

45%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

112
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

14

8%

LEVEL 2

39

24%

LEVEL 3

58

35%

LEVEL 4

54

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

124
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

13

8%

LEVEL 2

32

19%

LEVEL 3

70

41%

LEVEL 4

54

32%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.