500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

IS 34 TOTTENVILLE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

534
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,138

LEVEL 1

124

11%

LEVEL 2

480

42%

LEVEL 3

349

31%

LEVEL 4

185

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

572
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,114

LEVEL 1

141

13%

LEVEL 2

401

36%

LEVEL 3

375

34%

LEVEL 4

197

18%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

294
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 564

LEVEL 1

40

7%

LEVEL 2

230

41%

LEVEL 3

193

34%

LEVEL 4

101

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

318
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 543

LEVEL 1

39

7%

LEVEL 2

186

34%

LEVEL 3

208

38%

LEVEL 4

110

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

240
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 574

LEVEL 1

84

15%

LEVEL 2

250

44%

LEVEL 3

156

27%

LEVEL 4

84

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

254
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 571

LEVEL 1

102

18%

LEVEL 2

215

38%

LEVEL 3

167

29%

LEVEL 4

87

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

19
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

7

25%

LEVEL 3

10

36%

LEVEL 4

9

32%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

23
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

10

29%

LEVEL 4

13

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

457
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 969

LEVEL 1

104

11%

LEVEL 2

408

42%

LEVEL 3

298

31%

LEVEL 4

159

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

494
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 933

LEVEL 1

117

13%

LEVEL 2

322

35%

LEVEL 3

320

34%

LEVEL 4

174

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

53
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

17

13%

LEVEL 2

59

46%

LEVEL 3

37

29%

LEVEL 4

16

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

51
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

21

16%

LEVEL 2

63

47%

LEVEL 3

42

31%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

495
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 883

LEVEL 1

35

4%

LEVEL 2

353

40%

LEVEL 3

319

36%

LEVEL 4

176

20%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

523
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 829

LEVEL 1

35

4%

LEVEL 2

271

33%

LEVEL 3

336

41%

LEVEL 4

187

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

39
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

89

35%

LEVEL 2

127

50%

LEVEL 3

30

12%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

49
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

106

37%

LEVEL 2

130

46%

LEVEL 3

39

14%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

572
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,102

LEVEL 1

138

13%

LEVEL 2

392

36%

LEVEL 3

375

34%

LEVEL 4

197

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

9

75%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

408
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 772

LEVEL 1

62

8%

LEVEL 2

302

39%

LEVEL 3

260

34%

LEVEL 4

148

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

421
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 742

LEVEL 1

69

9%

LEVEL 2

252

34%

LEVEL 3

278

37%

LEVEL 4

143

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

126
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

62

17%

LEVEL 2

178

49%

LEVEL 3

89

24%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

151
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

72

19%

LEVEL 2

149

40%

LEVEL 3

97

26%

LEVEL 4

54

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.