500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 36 J C DRUMGOOLE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

262
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

49

11%

LEVEL 2

124

29%

LEVEL 3

148

34%

LEVEL 4

114

26%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

197
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

69

18%

LEVEL 2

126

32%

LEVEL 3

120

31%

LEVEL 4

77

20%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

122
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

22

11%

LEVEL 2

59

29%

LEVEL 3

79

39%

LEVEL 4

43

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

72
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

33

19%

LEVEL 2

71

40%

LEVEL 3

48

27%

LEVEL 4

24

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

140
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

27

12%

LEVEL 2

65

28%

LEVEL 3

69

30%

LEVEL 4

71

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

125
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

36

17%

LEVEL 2

55

25%

LEVEL 3

72

33%

LEVEL 4

53

25%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

22
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

16

70%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

5

28%

LEVEL 4

10

56%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

217
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

38

10%

LEVEL 2

114

31%

LEVEL 3

129

35%

LEVEL 4

88

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

160
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

58

18%

LEVEL 2

104

32%

LEVEL 3

99

31%

LEVEL 4

61

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

9

24%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

12

32%

LEVEL 4

8

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

8

18%

LEVEL 2

17

38%

LEVEL 3

14

31%

LEVEL 4

6

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

238
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

15

4%

LEVEL 2

92

27%

LEVEL 3

126

37%

LEVEL 4

112

32%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

20

7%

LEVEL 2

100

33%

LEVEL 3

105

35%

LEVEL 4

74

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

34

38%

LEVEL 2

32

36%

LEVEL 3

22

24%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

49

53%

LEVEL 2

26

28%

LEVEL 3

15

16%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

199
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

89

29%

LEVEL 3

105

34%

LEVEL 4

94

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

151
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

44

16%

LEVEL 2

84

30%

LEVEL 3

87

31%

LEVEL 4

64

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

29

23%

LEVEL 2

35

28%

LEVEL 3

43

34%

LEVEL 4

20

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

25

22%

LEVEL 2

42

37%

LEVEL 3

33

29%

LEVEL 4

13

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.