500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 36 J C DRUMGOOLE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the . This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

187
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

92

20%

LEVEL 2

173

38%

LEVEL 3

131

29%

LEVEL 4

56

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

259
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

69

15%

LEVEL 2

126

28%

LEVEL 3

163

36%

LEVEL 4

96

21%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

104
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

39

17%

LEVEL 2

81

36%

LEVEL 3

73

33%

LEVEL 4

31

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

144
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

27

12%

LEVEL 2

61

26%

LEVEL 3

93

40%

LEVEL 4

51

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

83
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

53

23%

LEVEL 2

92

40%

LEVEL 3

58

25%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

115
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

42

19%

LEVEL 2

65

29%

LEVEL 3

70

32%

LEVEL 4

45

20%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

3

18%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

7

41%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

19
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

10

45%

LEVEL 4

9

41%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

166
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

77

19%

LEVEL 2

157

39%

LEVEL 3

121

30%

LEVEL 4

45

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

224
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

59

15%

LEVEL 2

113

29%

LEVEL 3

142

36%

LEVEL 4

82

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

10

34%

LEVEL 2

10

34%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

8

26%

LEVEL 2

9

29%

LEVEL 3

9

29%

LEVEL 4

5

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

178
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

37

10%

LEVEL 2

144

40%

LEVEL 3

122

34%

LEVEL 4

56

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

245
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

92

26%

LEVEL 3

152

43%

LEVEL 4

93

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

55

59%

LEVEL 2

29

31%

LEVEL 3

9

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

56

54%

LEVEL 2

34

33%

LEVEL 3

11

11%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

187
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

90

20%

LEVEL 2

169

38%

LEVEL 3

131

29%

LEVEL 4

56

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

142
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

47

16%

LEVEL 2

114

38%

LEVEL 3

95

31%

LEVEL 4

47

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

194
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

30

10%

LEVEL 2

82

27%

LEVEL 3

120

39%

LEVEL 4

74

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

45

30%

LEVEL 2

59

40%

LEVEL 3

36

24%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

39

26%

LEVEL 2

44

30%

LEVEL 3

43

29%

LEVEL 4

22

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.