500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 36 J C DRUMGOOLE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

291
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

47

11%

LEVEL 2

97

22%

LEVEL 3

182

42%

LEVEL 4

109

25%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

241
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

40

10%

LEVEL 2

114

29%

LEVEL 3

155

39%

LEVEL 4

86

22%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

150
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

15

7%

LEVEL 2

37

18%

LEVEL 3

91

45%

LEVEL 4

59

29%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

51

29%

LEVEL 3

75

42%

LEVEL 4

40

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

141
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

32

14%

LEVEL 2

60

26%

LEVEL 3

91

39%

LEVEL 4

50

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

126
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

28

13%

LEVEL 2

63

29%

LEVEL 3

80

37%

LEVEL 4

46

21%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

9%

LEVEL 3

10

43%

LEVEL 4

11

48%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

6

33%

LEVEL 4

7

39%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

241
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

41

11%

LEVEL 2

87

24%

LEVEL 3

149

40%

LEVEL 4

92

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

195
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

30

9%

LEVEL 2

99

31%

LEVEL 3

127

39%

LEVEL 4

68

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

6

16%

LEVEL 2

6

16%

LEVEL 3

20

54%

LEVEL 4

5

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

9

20%

LEVEL 2

8

17%

LEVEL 3

18

39%

LEVEL 4

11

24%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

270
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

63

18%

LEVEL 3

164

48%

LEVEL 4

106

31%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

221
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

70

23%

LEVEL 3

138

46%

LEVEL 4

83

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

21
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

35

39%

LEVEL 2

34

38%

LEVEL 3

18

20%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

32

33%

LEVEL 2

44

46%

LEVEL 3

17

18%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

222
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

66

21%

LEVEL 3

132

43%

LEVEL 4

90

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

184
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

20

7%

LEVEL 2

76

27%

LEVEL 3

119

43%

LEVEL 4

65

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

27

21%

LEVEL 2

31

24%

LEVEL 3

50

39%

LEVEL 4

19

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

20

17%

LEVEL 2

38

33%

LEVEL 3

36

31%

LEVEL 4

21

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.