500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 56 LOUIS DESARIO SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

215
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

35

10%

LEVEL 2

106

30%

LEVEL 3

138

39%

LEVEL 4

77

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

21

7%

LEVEL 2

93

30%

LEVEL 3

110

35%

LEVEL 4

86

28%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

59

34%

LEVEL 3

64

37%

LEVEL 4

39

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

107
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

46

28%

LEVEL 3

63

38%

LEVEL 4

44

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

112
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

23

13%

LEVEL 2

47

26%

LEVEL 3

74

41%

LEVEL 4

38

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

89
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

47

32%

LEVEL 3

47

32%

LEVEL 4

42

29%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

188
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

29

9%

LEVEL 2

97

31%

LEVEL 3

122

39%

LEVEL 4

66

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

174
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

19

7%

LEVEL 2

77

29%

LEVEL 3

102

38%

LEVEL 4

72

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

6

24%

LEVEL 2

5

20%

LEVEL 3

9

36%

LEVEL 4

5

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

11

50%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

5

23%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

185
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

79

29%

LEVEL 3

115

43%

LEVEL 4

70

26%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

166
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

55

25%

LEVEL 3

95

42%

LEVEL 4

71

32%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

30
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

31

35%

LEVEL 2

27

31%

LEVEL 3

23

26%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

30
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

18

21%

LEVEL 2

38

44%

LEVEL 3

15

17%

LEVEL 4

15

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

125
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

53

28%

LEVEL 3

77

41%

LEVEL 4

48

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

133
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

47

24%

LEVEL 3

66

34%

LEVEL 4

67

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

90
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

23

14%

LEVEL 2

53

32%

LEVEL 3

61

37%

LEVEL 4

29

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

9

8%

LEVEL 2

46

39%

LEVEL 3

44

37%

LEVEL 4

19

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.