500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 56 LOUIS DESARIO SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the . This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

40

11%

LEVEL 2

128

35%

LEVEL 3

130

36%

LEVEL 4

63

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

215
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

35

10%

LEVEL 2

106

30%

LEVEL 3

138

39%

LEVEL 4

77

22%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

17

10%

LEVEL 2

61

36%

LEVEL 3

59

35%

LEVEL 4

32

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

59

34%

LEVEL 3

64

37%

LEVEL 4

39

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

102
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

23

12%

LEVEL 2

67

35%

LEVEL 3

71

37%

LEVEL 4

31

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

112
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

23

13%

LEVEL 2

47

26%

LEVEL 3

74

41%

LEVEL 4

38

21%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

167
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

33

11%

LEVEL 2

109

35%

LEVEL 3

112

36%

LEVEL 4

55

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

188
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

29

9%

LEVEL 2

97

31%

LEVEL 3

122

39%

LEVEL 4

66

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

6

17%

LEVEL 2

14

40%

LEVEL 3

12

34%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

6

24%

LEVEL 2

5

20%

LEVEL 3

9

36%

LEVEL 4

5

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

88

31%

LEVEL 3

119

43%

LEVEL 4

61

22%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

185
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

79

29%

LEVEL 3

115

43%

LEVEL 4

70

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

28

35%

LEVEL 2

40

49%

LEVEL 3

11

14%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

30
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

31

35%

LEVEL 2

27

31%

LEVEL 3

23

26%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

122
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

16

8%

LEVEL 2

59

30%

LEVEL 3

73

37%

LEVEL 4

49

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

125
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

53

28%

LEVEL 3

77

41%

LEVEL 4

48

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

24

15%

LEVEL 2

69

42%

LEVEL 3

57

35%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

90
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

23

14%

LEVEL 2

53

32%

LEVEL 3

61

37%

LEVEL 4

29

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.