500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 55 HENRY M BOEHM GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

44

14%

LEVEL 2

109

35%

LEVEL 3

99

32%

LEVEL 4

60

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

53

17%

LEVEL 2

107

35%

LEVEL 3

85

28%

LEVEL 4

59

19%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

14

9%

LEVEL 2

59

39%

LEVEL 3

48

32%

LEVEL 4

31

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

75
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

25

15%

LEVEL 2

62

38%

LEVEL 3

43

27%

LEVEL 4

32

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

30

19%

LEVEL 2

50

31%

LEVEL 3

51

32%

LEVEL 4

29

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

28

20%

LEVEL 2

45

32%

LEVEL 3

42

30%

LEVEL 4

27

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

5

56%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

136
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

39

15%

LEVEL 2

88

33%

LEVEL 3

90

34%

LEVEL 4

46

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

123
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

46

18%

LEVEL 2

89

34%

LEVEL 3

75

29%

LEVEL 4

48

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

4

12%

LEVEL 2

12

36%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

9

27%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

5

16%

LEVEL 2

13

41%

LEVEL 3

7

22%

LEVEL 4

7

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

84

35%

LEVEL 3

86

35%

LEVEL 4

59

24%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

132
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

28

12%

LEVEL 2

82

34%

LEVEL 3

77

32%

LEVEL 4

55

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

30

43%

LEVEL 2

25

36%

LEVEL 3

13

19%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

25

40%

LEVEL 2

25

40%

LEVEL 3

8

13%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

115
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

24

12%

LEVEL 2

63

31%

LEVEL 3

72

36%

LEVEL 4

43

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

34

17%

LEVEL 2

68

33%

LEVEL 3

60

29%

LEVEL 4

43

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

20

18%

LEVEL 2

46

42%

LEVEL 3

27

25%

LEVEL 4

17

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

19

19%

LEVEL 2

39

39%

LEVEL 3

25

25%

LEVEL 4

16

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.