500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 55 HENRY M BOEHM GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

48

15%

LEVEL 2

107

34%

LEVEL 3

104

33%

LEVEL 4

59

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

44

14%

LEVEL 2

109

35%

LEVEL 3

99

32%

LEVEL 4

60

19%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

21

13%

LEVEL 2

55

34%

LEVEL 3

56

34%

LEVEL 4

32

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

14

9%

LEVEL 2

59

39%

LEVEL 3

48

32%

LEVEL 4

31

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

27

18%

LEVEL 2

52

34%

LEVEL 3

48

31%

LEVEL 4

27

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

30

19%

LEVEL 2

50

31%

LEVEL 3

51

32%

LEVEL 4

29

18%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

4

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

5

56%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

143
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

41

15%

LEVEL 2

96

34%

LEVEL 3

91

33%

LEVEL 4

52

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

136
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

39

15%

LEVEL 2

88

33%

LEVEL 3

90

34%

LEVEL 4

46

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

6

27%

LEVEL 2

7

32%

LEVEL 3

6

27%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

4

12%

LEVEL 2

12

36%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

9

27%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

73

30%

LEVEL 3

97

40%

LEVEL 4

55

23%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

84

35%

LEVEL 3

86

35%

LEVEL 4

59

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

32

42%

LEVEL 2

34

44%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

30

43%

LEVEL 2

25

36%

LEVEL 3

13

19%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

125
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

21

10%

LEVEL 2

66

31%

LEVEL 3

78

37%

LEVEL 4

47

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

115
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

24

12%

LEVEL 2

63

31%

LEVEL 3

72

36%

LEVEL 4

43

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

27

25%

LEVEL 2

41

39%

LEVEL 3

26

25%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

20

18%

LEVEL 2

46

42%

LEVEL 3

27

25%

LEVEL 4

17

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.