500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 45 JOHN TYLER GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

178
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

95

24%

LEVEL 2

124

31%

LEVEL 3

127

32%

LEVEL 4

51

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

89

23%

LEVEL 2

138

35%

LEVEL 3

126

32%

LEVEL 4

36

9%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

109
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

34

18%

LEVEL 2

48

25%

LEVEL 3

76

40%

LEVEL 4

33

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

97
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

33

16%

LEVEL 2

76

37%

LEVEL 3

76

37%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

61

30%

LEVEL 2

76

37%

LEVEL 3

51

25%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

56

31%

LEVEL 2

62

34%

LEVEL 3

50

27%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

3

11%

LEVEL 2

7

26%

LEVEL 3

8

30%

LEVEL 4

9

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

3

11%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

12

44%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

50
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

17

19%

LEVEL 2

22

25%

LEVEL 3

31

35%

LEVEL 4

19

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

42
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

13

17%

LEVEL 2

22

29%

LEVEL 3

30

39%

LEVEL 4

12

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

26
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

20

26%

LEVEL 2

32

41%

LEVEL 3

22

28%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

29

42%

LEVEL 2

20

29%

LEVEL 3

16

23%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

73
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

53

28%

LEVEL 2

61

33%

LEVEL 3

57

30%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

74
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

44

22%

LEVEL 2

80

40%

LEVEL 3

61

31%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

166
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

37

13%

LEVEL 2

93

31%

LEVEL 3

116

39%

LEVEL 4

50

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

44

15%

LEVEL 2

104

34%

LEVEL 3

119

39%

LEVEL 4

35

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

58

57%

LEVEL 2

31

31%

LEVEL 3

11

11%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

45

52%

LEVEL 2

34

39%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

177
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

79

21%

LEVEL 2

117

31%

LEVEL 3

126

34%

LEVEL 4

51

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

160
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

76

21%

LEVEL 2

128

35%

LEVEL 3

124

34%

LEVEL 4

36

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

16

67%

LEVEL 2

7

29%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

13

52%

LEVEL 2

10

40%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

12

12%

LEVEL 2

22

22%

LEVEL 3

38

38%

LEVEL 4

28

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

14

13%

LEVEL 2

25

24%

LEVEL 3

47

45%

LEVEL 4

18

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

112
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

83

28%

LEVEL 2

102

34%

LEVEL 3

89

30%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

75

26%

LEVEL 2

113

40%

LEVEL 3

79

28%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

169
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

90

24%

LEVEL 2

113

30%

LEVEL 3

121

33%

LEVEL 4

48

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

156
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

81

23%

LEVEL 2

121

34%

LEVEL 3

121

34%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

5

20%

LEVEL 2

11

44%

LEVEL 3

6

24%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

8

26%

LEVEL 2

17

55%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.