500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

NEWFANE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the . This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

202
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 787

LEVEL 1

245

31%

LEVEL 2

340

43%

LEVEL 3

147

19%

LEVEL 4

55

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

189
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 674

LEVEL 1

182

27%

LEVEL 2

303

45%

LEVEL 3

138

20%

LEVEL 4

51

8%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

115

32%

LEVEL 2

151

42%

LEVEL 3

78

22%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

92

29%

LEVEL 2

135

43%

LEVEL 3

62

20%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

106
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

130

31%

LEVEL 2

189

44%

LEVEL 3

69

16%

LEVEL 4

37

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

104
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

90

25%

LEVEL 2

168

46%

LEVEL 3

76

21%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

194
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 742

LEVEL 1

225

30%

LEVEL 2

323

44%

LEVEL 3

142

19%

LEVEL 4

52

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

179
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 631

LEVEL 1

162

26%

LEVEL 2

290

46%

LEVEL 3

131

21%

LEVEL 4

48

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

14

58%

LEVEL 2

7

29%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

14

58%

LEVEL 2

7

29%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

198
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 688

LEVEL 1

171

25%

LEVEL 2

319

46%

LEVEL 3

145

21%

LEVEL 4

53

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 576

LEVEL 1

116

20%

LEVEL 2

279

48%

LEVEL 3

131

23%

LEVEL 4

50

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

74

75%

LEVEL 2

21

21%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

66

67%

LEVEL 2

24

24%

LEVEL 3

7

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

152
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 506

LEVEL 1

125

25%

LEVEL 2

229

45%

LEVEL 3

110

22%

LEVEL 4

42

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

118
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

82

21%

LEVEL 2

187

48%

LEVEL 3

84

22%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

120

43%

LEVEL 2

111

40%

LEVEL 3

37

13%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

100

35%

LEVEL 2

116

40%

LEVEL 3

54

19%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.