500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

CAMDEN MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the . This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 490

LEVEL 1

140

29%

LEVEL 2

213

43%

LEVEL 3

112

23%

LEVEL 4

25

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

84

25%

LEVEL 2

152

45%

LEVEL 3

74

22%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

65

27%

LEVEL 2

107

45%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

34

20%

LEVEL 2

83

49%

LEVEL 3

37

22%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

75

30%

LEVEL 2

106

42%

LEVEL 3

58

23%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

50

29%

LEVEL 2

69

40%

LEVEL 3

37

22%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

133
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 471

LEVEL 1

133

28%

LEVEL 2

205

44%

LEVEL 3

109

23%

LEVEL 4

24

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

99
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

76

23%

LEVEL 2

149

46%

LEVEL 3

71

22%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

135
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

77

19%

LEVEL 2

202

49%

LEVEL 3

110

27%

LEVEL 4

25

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

37

13%

LEVEL 2

138

50%

LEVEL 3

73

26%

LEVEL 4

30

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

63

83%

LEVEL 2

11

14%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

47

76%

LEVEL 2

14

23%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

30

15%

LEVEL 2

92

47%

LEVEL 3

56

29%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

19

13%

LEVEL 2

70

47%

LEVEL 3

37

25%

LEVEL 4

22

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

110

37%

LEVEL 2

121

41%

LEVEL 3

56

19%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

65

34%

LEVEL 2

82

43%

LEVEL 3

37

19%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.