500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

CAMILLUS MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

89

25%

LEVEL 2

129

36%

LEVEL 3

103

28%

LEVEL 4

42

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

60

18%

LEVEL 2

144

44%

LEVEL 3

84

26%

LEVEL 4

39

12%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

28

16%

LEVEL 2

60

34%

LEVEL 3

62

35%

LEVEL 4

27

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

19

12%

LEVEL 2

62

39%

LEVEL 3

51

32%

LEVEL 4

25

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

61

33%

LEVEL 2

69

37%

LEVEL 3

41

22%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

41

24%

LEVEL 2

82

48%

LEVEL 3

33

19%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

4

80%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

138
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

76

23%

LEVEL 2

118

36%

LEVEL 3

99

30%

LEVEL 4

39

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

114
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

50

17%

LEVEL 2

138

46%

LEVEL 3

79

26%

LEVEL 4

35

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

6

60%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

54

17%

LEVEL 2

121

38%

LEVEL 3

103

32%

LEVEL 4

40

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

42

14%

LEVEL 2

136

45%

LEVEL 3

83

28%

LEVEL 4

39

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

35

78%

LEVEL 2

8

18%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

18

67%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

135
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

58

19%

LEVEL 2

105

35%

LEVEL 3

95

32%

LEVEL 4

40

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

116
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

43

15%

LEVEL 2

122

43%

LEVEL 3

79

28%

LEVEL 4

37

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

31

48%

LEVEL 2

24

37%

LEVEL 3

8

12%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

17

37%

LEVEL 2

22

48%

LEVEL 3

5

11%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.