500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

NORTH SYRACUSE JUNIOR HS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

212
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 691

LEVEL 1

201

29%

LEVEL 2

278

40%

LEVEL 3

163

24%

LEVEL 4

49

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 505

LEVEL 1

157

31%

LEVEL 2

183

36%

LEVEL 3

122

24%

LEVEL 4

43

9%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

132
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

78

23%

LEVEL 2

134

39%

LEVEL 3

102

30%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

93
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

50

22%

LEVEL 2

89

38%

LEVEL 3

67

29%

LEVEL 4

26

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

123

35%

LEVEL 2

144

41%

LEVEL 3

61

18%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

107

39%

LEVEL 2

94

34%

LEVEL 3

55

20%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

10

45%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

9

33%

LEVEL 2

12

44%

LEVEL 3

6

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

197
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 607

LEVEL 1

166

27%

LEVEL 2

244

40%

LEVEL 3

151

25%

LEVEL 4

46

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

143
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

126

30%

LEVEL 2

156

37%

LEVEL 3

104

24%

LEVEL 4

39

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

17

50%

LEVEL 2

16

47%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

14

61%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

6

32%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

208
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 615

LEVEL 1

143

23%

LEVEL 2

264

43%

LEVEL 3

159

26%

LEVEL 4

49

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

108

24%

LEVEL 2

179

40%

LEVEL 3

121

27%

LEVEL 4

43

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

58

76%

LEVEL 2

14

18%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

49

91%

LEVEL 2

4

7%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

178
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

84

19%

LEVEL 2

188

42%

LEVEL 3

132

29%

LEVEL 4

46

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

133
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

78

23%

LEVEL 2

130

38%

LEVEL 3

97

28%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

117

49%

LEVEL 2

90

37%

LEVEL 3

31

13%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

79

48%

LEVEL 2

53

32%

LEVEL 3

25

15%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.