500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PINE GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 505

LEVEL 1

177

35%

LEVEL 2

167

33%

LEVEL 3

119

24%

LEVEL 4

42

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

171
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 538

LEVEL 1

176

33%

LEVEL 2

191

36%

LEVEL 3

101

19%

LEVEL 4

70

13%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

94
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

54

24%

LEVEL 2

75

34%

LEVEL 3

67

30%

LEVEL 4

27

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

93
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

70

29%

LEVEL 2

75

32%

LEVEL 3

52

22%

LEVEL 4

41

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

123

44%

LEVEL 2

92

33%

LEVEL 3

52

18%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

106

35%

LEVEL 2

116

39%

LEVEL 3

49

16%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

9

60%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

3

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

147
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

146

33%

LEVEL 2

149

34%

LEVEL 3

108

24%

LEVEL 4

39

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

157
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 471

LEVEL 1

151

32%

LEVEL 2

163

35%

LEVEL 3

95

20%

LEVEL 4

62

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

19

63%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

15

63%

LEVEL 2

6

25%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

4

21%

LEVEL 2

10

53%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

133

30%

LEVEL 2

157

35%

LEVEL 3

116

26%

LEVEL 4

41

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

167
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

129

28%

LEVEL 2

169

36%

LEVEL 3

97

21%

LEVEL 4

70

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

44

76%

LEVEL 2

10

17%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

47

64%

LEVEL 2

22

30%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

161
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 494

LEVEL 1

168

34%

LEVEL 2

165

33%

LEVEL 3

119

24%

LEVEL 4

42

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

171
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 524

LEVEL 1

163

31%

LEVEL 2

190

36%

LEVEL 3

101

19%

LEVEL 4

70

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

9

82%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

13

93%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

121
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

78

26%

LEVEL 2

103

34%

LEVEL 3

83

27%

LEVEL 4

38

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

127
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

77

24%

LEVEL 2

118

37%

LEVEL 3

74

23%

LEVEL 4

53

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

99

49%

LEVEL 2

64

32%

LEVEL 3

36

18%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

99

46%

LEVEL 2

73

34%

LEVEL 3

27

13%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

161
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 498

LEVEL 1

173

35%

LEVEL 2

164

33%

LEVEL 3

119

24%

LEVEL 4

42

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

171
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 533

LEVEL 1

172

32%

LEVEL 2

190

36%

LEVEL 3

101

19%

LEVEL 4

70

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.